<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/09/06/agencies-re-propose-rule-implementing-risk-retention-requirements-of-dodd-frank-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:07:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Agencies Re-Propose Rule Implementing Risk Retention Requirements of Dodd-Frank Act</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/09/06/agencies-re-propose-rule-implementing-risk-retention-requirements-of-dodd-frank-act/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=agencies-re-propose-rule-implementing-risk-retention-requirements-of-dodd-frank-act</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/09/06/agencies-re-propose-rule-implementing-risk-retention-requirements-of-dodd-frank-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Banking & Financial Institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset-backed securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securitization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=52385?d=20150106125735EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On August 28, 2013, the FDIC, OCC, FRB, SEC, Federal Housing Finance Agency, and Department of Housing and Urban Development (collectively, the “Agencies”) issued a second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “revised proposal”) that would implement the risk retention requirements of Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which amended the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Noam Noked, co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Friday, September 6, 2013 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post comes to us from <a href="http://www.goodwinprocter.com/People/F/Fischer-Eric.aspx" target="_blank">Eric R. Fischer</a>, partner in the Business Law Department at Goodwin Procter LLP, and is based on a Goodwin Procter Financial Services Alert by <a href="http://www.goodwinprocter.com/People/S/Stern-William.aspx" target="_blank">William E. Stern</a>, <a href="http://www.goodwinprocter.com/People/T/Thompson-Brandon.aspx" target="_blank">Brandon T. Thompson</a>, and <a href="http://www.goodwinprocter.com/People/B/Baum-Brian.aspx" target="_blank">Brian M. Baum</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>On August 28, 2013, the FDIC, OCC, FRB, SEC, Federal Housing Finance Agency, and Department of Housing and Urban Development (collectively, the “Agencies”) issued a second <a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2013/34-70277.pdf" target="_blank">Notice of Proposed Rulemaking</a> (the “revised proposal”) that would implement the risk retention requirements of Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which amended the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) by adding a new Section 15G. Section 15G requires the Agencies to issue rules that would generally require that a securitizer of asset-backed securities (“ABS”) retain an economic interest in not less than 5% of the credit risk of the assets collateralizing such ABS. As discussed in the <a href="http://www.goodwinprocter.com/Publications/Newsletters/Financial-Services-Alert/2011/20110419.aspx?article=1" target="_blank">April 19, 2011 Financial Services Alert</a>, the first <a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2011/34-64148.pdf" target="_blank">Notice of Proposed Rulemaking</a> (the “original proposal”) was jointly approved in April 2011 by the Agencies. In response to numerous comments received on the original proposal, the Agencies collectively developed the revised proposal, which includes significant modifications.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/09/06/agencies-re-propose-rule-implementing-risk-retention-requirements-of-dodd-frank-act/#more-52385" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Agencies Re-Propose Rule Implementing Risk Retention Requirements of Dodd-Frank Act">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/09/06/agencies-re-propose-rule-implementing-risk-retention-requirements-of-dodd-frank-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
