<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/10/22/equity-securities-in-an-ma-transaction-after-the-jobs-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 11:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Equity Securities in an M&#038;A Transaction after the JOBS Act</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/10/22/equity-securities-in-an-ma-transaction-after-the-jobs-act/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=equity-securities-in-an-ma-transaction-after-the-jobs-act</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/10/22/equity-securities-in-an-ma-transaction-after-the-jobs-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JOBS Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private placements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 506]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=53816?d=20150106124805EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In April 2012, we wrote here about the potential future impact of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”) on M&#38;A transactions in which an acquirer seeks to issue its privately placed equity securities as consideration in an acquisition. Our discussion at the time focused on the conditions of Rule 506 of Regulation D [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Kobi Kastiel, Co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Tuesday, October 22, 2013 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post comes to us from <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/jmoloney" target="_blank">James Moloney</a>, partner and co-chair of the Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Practice Group at Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP, and is based on a Gibson Dunn alert by <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/rlittle" target="_blank">Robert B. Little</a> and <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/ashoemaker" target="_blank">Anthony Shoemaker</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>In April 2012, we wrote <a href="http://www.securitiesregulationmonitor.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=165" target="_blank_">here</a> about the potential future impact of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”) on M&amp;A transactions in which an acquirer seeks to issue its privately placed equity securities as consideration in an acquisition. Our discussion at the time focused on the conditions of Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and, in particular, the tension faced by issuers that are required to determine the offerees’ status as “accredited investors” or as otherwise suitable to evaluate the potential investment. We noted that such issuers have historically been prohibited from using any form of “general solicitation” when offering securities in such transactions. Subsequently, in July 2013, the SEC adopted final rules (effective September 23, 2013) to eliminate the absolute prohibition against general solicitation in securities offerings conducted pursuant to Rule 506, as required by Section 201(a) of the JOBS Act (Gibson Dunn’s summary and analysis of the rules may be found <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/publications/Documents/SEC-Approves-Final-Rules-to-Permit-Advertising-in-Rule-506-and-Rule-144A-Offerings.pdf" target="_blank_">here</a>). The following discussion updates our earlier post to address the legal and practical effects of these new rules for M&amp;A transactions that include a private placement component.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/10/22/equity-securities-in-an-ma-transaction-after-the-jobs-act/#more-53816" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Equity Securities in an M&#038;A Transaction after the JOBS Act">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/10/22/equity-securities-in-an-ma-transaction-after-the-jobs-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
