<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/12/13/secs-non-decision-decision-on-corporate-political-activity-a-policy-and-political-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 18:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SEC&#8217;s Non-Decision Decision on Corporate Political Activity a Policy and Political Mistake</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/12/13/secs-non-decision-decision-on-corporate-political-activity-a-policy-and-political-mistake/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=secs-non-decision-decision-on-corporate-political-activity-a-policy-and-political-mistake</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/12/13/secs-non-decision-decision-on-corporate-political-activity-a-policy-and-political-mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 13:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HLS Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United v. FEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=56636?d=20230314134342EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SEC’s recent decision to take disclosure of political activities off the SEC’s agenda is a policy mistake, as it ignores the best research on the point, described below, and perpetuates a key loophole in the investor-relevant disclosure rules, allowing large companies to omit material information about the politically inflected risks they run with other [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by John Coates, Harvard Law School, on Friday, December 13, 2013 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/index.html?id=11" target="_blank" rel="noopener">John Coates</a> is the John F. Cogan, Jr. Professor of Law and Economics at Harvard Law School. His empirical work on corporate political spending includes <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1881883" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Corporate Governance and Corporate Political Activity: What Effect Will Citizens United Have on Shareholder Wealth?</a>, <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1923804" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Fulfilling Kennedy’s Promise: Why the SEC Should Mandate Disclosure of Corporate Political Activity</a> (with Taylor Lincoln), and <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2172638" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Corporate Politics, Governance, and Value Before and after Citizens United</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The SEC’s recent decision to take disclosure of political activities off the SEC’s agenda is a policy mistake, as it ignores the best research on the point, described below, and perpetuates a key loophole in the investor-relevant disclosure rules, allowing large companies to omit material information about the politically inflected risks they run with other people’s money. It is also a political mistake, as it repudiates the 600,000+ investors who have written to the SEC personally to ask it to adopt a rule requiring such disclosure, and will let entrenched business interests focus their lobbying solely on watering down regulation mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act and the 2012 securities law statute, rather than having also to work to influence a disclosure regime.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/12/13/secs-non-decision-decision-on-corporate-political-activity-a-policy-and-political-mistake/#more-56636" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading SEC&#8217;s Non-Decision Decision on Corporate Political Activity a Policy and Political Mistake">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/12/13/secs-non-decision-decision-on-corporate-political-activity-a-policy-and-political-mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
