<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/12/26/who-is-responsible-for-libor-rate-fixing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 11:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Who Is Responsible for Libor Rate-Fixing?</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/12/26/who-is-responsible-for-libor-rate-fixing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=who-is-responsible-for-libor-rate-fixing</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/12/26/who-is-responsible-for-libor-rate-fixing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking & Financial Institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIBOR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=56991?d=20141216093143EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On December 4, the European Commission announced the imposition of €1.7 billion in fines on eight international banks for participation in cartels in euro- and yen-denominated interest-rate derivatives. The banks had conspired on submissions for euro and yen Libor rates, and the fines were imposed under European antitrust law. As EU Commissioner Joaquín Almunia said, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by June Rhee, Co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Thursday, December 26, 2013 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post comes to us from <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/faculty/markrpatterson.htm" target="_blank">Mark R. Patterson</a> at Fordham University School of Law.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>On December 4, the European Commission <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-1208_en.htm" target="_blank">announced</a> the imposition of €1.7 billion in fines on eight international banks for participation in cartels in euro- and yen-denominated interest-rate derivatives. The banks had conspired on submissions for euro and yen Libor rates, and the fines were imposed under European antitrust law. As EU Commissioner Joaquín Almunia said, “What is shocking about the LIBOR and EURIBOR scandals is not only the manipulation of benchmarks, which is being tackled by financial regulators worldwide, but also the collusion between banks who are supposed to be competing with each other.”</p>
<p>Commissioner Almunia’s comment might have been addressed specifically to U.S. antitrust enforcers. Although the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice has been involved in some of the settlements that the department has reached with banks, to date none of those settlements has included antitrust liability. Instead, the banks have pled guilty or admitted liability only for fraud, even though the statements issued by the Justice Department when announcing the settlements describe just the sort of collusion to which Commissioner Almunia referred.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/12/26/who-is-responsible-for-libor-rate-fixing/#more-56991" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Who Is Responsible for Libor Rate-Fixing?">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/12/26/who-is-responsible-for-libor-rate-fixing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
