<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/02/07/halliburton-the-morning-after/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Halliburton: The Morning After</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/02/07/halliburton-the-morning-after/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=halliburton-the-morning-after</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/02/07/halliburton-the-morning-after/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erica John Fund v. Halliburton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud-on-the-Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halliburton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=59544?d=20141202155145EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blogosphere is abuzz over Halliburton. [1] Will the Supreme Court overturn Basic [2] and abolish the fraud-on-the-market presumption? Will the decision end shareholder class actions as we have known them? Presumably, by the Fourth of July, we will know. The purpose of this post is not to predict the outcome of Halliburton. Rather, it [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Boris Feldman, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Friday, February 7, 2014 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.borisfeldman.com" target="_blank">Boris Feldman</a> is a member of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &amp; Rosati, P.C. The views expressed in this post are those of Mr. Feldman and do not reflect those of his firm or clients. <a href="http://wsgr.com/WSGR/DBIndex.aspx?SectionName=attorneys/BIOS/11745.htm" target="_blank">Doru Gavril</a> also contributed to this post. The Supreme Court’s expected reconsideration of <em>Basic</em> is also discussed in a Harvard Law School Discussion Paper by Professors Lucian Bebchuk and Allen Ferrell, <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2371304" target="_blank">Rethinking <em>Basic</em></a>, discussed on the Forum <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2014/01/06/rethinking-basic/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The blogosphere is abuzz over <em>Halliburton</em>. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2014/02/07/halliburton-the-morning-after/#1">[1]</a><a name="1b"></a> Will the Supreme Court overturn <em>Basic</em> <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2014/02/07/halliburton-the-morning-after/#2">[2]</a><a name="2b"></a> and abolish the fraud-on-the-market presumption? Will the decision end shareholder class actions as we have known them? Presumably, by the Fourth of July, we will know.</p>
<p>The purpose of this post is not to predict the outcome of <em>Halliburton</em>. Rather, it is to begin thinking about ways in which the plaintiffs’ bar may respond if the Court does overturn <em>Basic</em>. Those who think that plaintiffs’ lawyers will go quiet into the night are, in my opinion, ignoring the lessons of history.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/02/07/halliburton-the-morning-after/#more-59544" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Halliburton: The Morning After">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/02/07/halliburton-the-morning-after/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
