<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/02/10/top-ten-2013-delaware-corporate-and-commercial-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Top Ten 2013 Delaware Corporate and Commercial Decisions</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/02/10/top-ten-2013-delaware-corporate-and-commercial-decisions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=top-ten-2013-delaware-corporate-and-commercial-decisions</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/02/10/top-ten-2013-delaware-corporate-and-commercial-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. federal courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=59337?d=20141202154646EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is our ninth annual review of key Delaware corporate and commercial decisions. During 2013, we reviewed and summarized over 200 decisions from Delaware’s Supreme Court and Court of Chancery on corporate and commercial issues. Among the decisions with the most far-reaching application and importance during 2013 are the “top ten” that we are highlighting [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Francis G.X. Pileggi, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC , on Monday, February 10, 2014 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.eckertseamans.com/directory.aspx?View=Detail&amp;DirectoryID=815" target="_blank">Francis G.X. Pileggi</a> is Member-in-Charge of the Wilmington office of Eckert Seamans Cherin &amp; Mellott, LLC and publisher of the <a href="http://www.delawarelitigation.com/" target="_blank">Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog</a>. This post is based on an article by Mr. Pileggi, <a href="http://www.eckertseamans.com/directory.aspx?View=Detail&amp;DirectoryID=855" target="_blank">Kevin F. Brady</a>, and <a href="http://www.eckertseamans.com/directory.aspx?View=Detail&amp;DirectoryID=817" target="_blank">Jill K. Agro</a>. This post is part of the <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>, which is co-sponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>This is our ninth annual review of key Delaware corporate and commercial decisions. During 2013, we reviewed and summarized over 200 decisions from Delaware’s Supreme Court and Court of Chancery on corporate and commercial issues. Among the decisions with the most far-reaching application and importance during 2013 are the “top ten” that we are highlighting in this short overview. We are providing links to the more complete blog summaries, and the actual court rulings, for each of the cases that we highlight below.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/02/10/top-ten-2013-delaware-corporate-and-commercial-decisions/#more-59337" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Top Ten 2013 Delaware Corporate and Commercial Decisions">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/02/10/top-ten-2013-delaware-corporate-and-commercial-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
