<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/05/21/the-expanding-scope-of-whistleblower-protections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 11:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Expanding Scope of Whistleblower Protections</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/05/21/the-expanding-scope-of-whistleblower-protections/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-expanding-scope-of-whistleblower-protections</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/05/21/the-expanding-scope-of-whistleblower-protections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 13:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance & ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraterritoriality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=63368?d=20141215161100EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) was enacted following the accounting scandals of the early 2000s involving Enron, WorldCom and other public companies. Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) in 2010 following the global credit crisis that began a few years earlier. Both statutes offer protections for employees who [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Yaron Nili, Co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Wednesday, May 21, 2014 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post comes to us from <a href="http://www.cadwalader.com/professionals/jason-halper" target="_blank">Jason M. Halper</a>, partner at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP, and is based on a Cadwalader publication by Mr. Halper, <a href="http://www.cadwalader.com/professionals/lambrina-mathews" target="_blank">Lambrina Mathews</a>, and <a href="http://www.cadwalader.com/professionals/william-foley" target="_blank">William J. Foley</a>. The complete publication, including footnotes, is available <a href="http://www.cadwalader.com/resources/clients-friends-memos/before-the-whistle-blows-understanding-and-addressing-the-expanding-scope-of-whistleblower-protections-under-sarbanes-oxley-and-dodd-frank" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) was enacted following the accounting scandals of the early 2000s involving Enron, WorldCom and other public companies. Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) in 2010 following the global credit crisis that began a few years earlier. Both statutes offer protections for employees who face retaliation for “blowing the whistle” on corporate misconduct, and Dodd-Frank also provides enhanced monetary incentives to the employees who do so. Given the SEC’s recent and often-stated commitment to strict enforcement of the securities laws, coupled with the fact that the SEC has received over 6,000 whistleblower complaints in the past two years (and has made six awards since inception of its whistleblower reward program in 2011), whistleblowing activity now is a fact of corporate life that is likely to become even more prevalent as awareness spreads of the Dodd-Frank whistleblower reward program.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/05/21/the-expanding-scope-of-whistleblower-protections/#more-63368" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Expanding Scope of Whistleblower Protections">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/05/21/the-expanding-scope-of-whistleblower-protections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
