<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/05/23/increased-scrutiny-of-high-frequency-trading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:20:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Increased Scrutiny of High-Frequency Trading</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/05/23/increased-scrutiny-of-high-frequency-trading/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=increased-scrutiny-of-high-frequency-trading</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/05/23/increased-scrutiny-of-high-frequency-trading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 13:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algorithmic trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High-frequency trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proprietary trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=63507?d=20141215161022EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the publication of Michael Lewis’ new book, Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt (“Flash Boys”), plaintiffs’ lawyers and US government regulators have increasingly focused their attention on financial institutions participating in high-frequency trading (“HFT”). Less than three weeks after the release of Flash Boys, private plaintiffs’ lawyers filed a class action lawsuit against 27 [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Noam Noked, co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Friday, May 23, 2014 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post comes to us from <a href="http://www.mayerbrown.com/people/Matthew-Rossi/" target="_blank">Matthew Rossi</a>, partner in the Securities Litigation &amp; Enforcement practice at Mayer Brown LLP, and is based on a Mayer Brown Legal Update by Mr. Rossi, <a href="http://www.mayerbrown.com/people/Joseph-De-Simone/" target="_blank">Joseph De Simone</a>, and <a href="http://www.mayerbrown.com/people/Jerome-J-Roche/" target="_blank">Jerome J. Roche</a>. The complete publication, including footnotes, is available <a href="http://www.mayerbrown.com/files/Publication/272e9281-0ab5-481d-b98b-bca0b872e344/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/53b4f4ad-1a78-4553-9ede-d850bf05458c/UPDATE_Increased_Public-Private_Scrutiny_0514.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Following the publication of Michael Lewis’ new book, <em>Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt</em> (“<em>Flash Boys</em>”), plaintiffs’ lawyers and US government regulators have increasingly focused their attention on financial institutions participating in high-frequency trading (“HFT”). Less than three weeks after the release of <em>Flash Boys</em>, private plaintiffs’ lawyers filed a class action lawsuit against 27 financial services firms and 14 national securities exchanges (with additional defendants likely to be named later) alleging that the defendants’ HFT practices in the US equities markets violated the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws. Plaintiffs’ lawyers filed a separate action against The CME Group, Inc. (“CME”) and The Board of Trade of the City of Chicago (“CBOT”) containing similar allegations in US derivatives markets.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/05/23/increased-scrutiny-of-high-frequency-trading/#more-63507" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Increased Scrutiny of High-Frequency Trading">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/05/23/increased-scrutiny-of-high-frequency-trading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
