<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/09/02/the-tension-between-conservative-corporate-law-theory-and-citizens-united/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 11:32:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Tension Between Conservative Corporate Law Theory and Citizens United</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/09/02/the-tension-between-conservative-corporate-law-theory-and-citizens-united/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-tension-between-conservative-corporate-law-theory-and-citizens-united</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/09/02/the-tension-between-conservative-corporate-law-theory-and-citizens-united/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HLS Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United v. FEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=65415?d=20230309152204EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leo Strine, Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court Review and a Senior Fellow of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, and Nicholas Walter recently issued an essay with that is forthcoming in Cornell Law Review. The essay, titled Conservative Collision Course?: the Tension Between Conservative Corporate Law Theory and Citizens United, is [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Kobi Kastiel, Co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Tuesday, September 2, 2014 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post is based on a recent article forthcoming in Cornell Law Review, earlier issued as a working paper of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, by Leo Strine, Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court and a Senior Fellow of the Program, and Nicholas Walter, law clerk at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and a former law clerk at Delaware Court of Chancery. The article, <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2481061" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Conservative Collision Course?: the Tension Between Conservative Corporate Law Theory and <em>Citizens United</em></a>, is available <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2481061" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>. Work from the Program on Corporate Governance about corporate political spending includes <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2142115" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Shining Light on Corporate Political Spending</a> by Lucian Bebchuk and Robert Jackson, discussed on the Forum <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/10/02/shining-light-on-corporate-political-spending/">here</a>, and <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1670085" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Corporate Political Speech: Who Decides</a>? by Lucian Bebchuk and Robert Jackson, available <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1670085" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Leo Strine, Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court Review and a Senior Fellow of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, and Nicholas Walter recently issued an essay with that is forthcoming in Cornell Law Review. The essay, titled <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2481061" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Conservative Collision Course?: the Tension Between Conservative Corporate Law Theory and <em>Citizens United</em></a>, is available <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2481061" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>.</p>
<p>The abstract of Chief Justice Strine’s and Walter’s essay summarizes it briefly as follows:</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/09/02/the-tension-between-conservative-corporate-law-theory-and-citizens-united/#more-65415" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Tension Between Conservative Corporate Law Theory and Citizens United">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/09/02/the-tension-between-conservative-corporate-law-theory-and-citizens-united/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
