<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/03/13/a-modest-strategy-for-combatting-frivolous-ipo-lawsuits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>A Modest Strategy for Combatting Frivolous IPO Lawsuits</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/03/13/a-modest-strategy-for-combatting-frivolous-ipo-lawsuits/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-modest-strategy-for-combatting-frivolous-ipo-lawsuits</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/03/13/a-modest-strategy-for-combatting-frivolous-ipo-lawsuits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquisition agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underwriting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=68800?d=20150324095231EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="background: #F8F8F8;padding: 10px;margin-top: 5px;margin-bottom: 10px"><strong>Editor's Note:</strong> <a href="http://www.borisfeldman.com" target="_blank">Boris Feldman</a> is a member of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &#38; Rosati, P.C. The views expressed in this post are those of Mr. Feldman and do not reflect those of his firm or clients.</div>

<p>With a minor change to the customary lock-up agreement, issuers and underwriters may be better able to fight frivolous IPO lawsuits. By allowing non-registration statement shares to enter the market, underwriters may prevent Section 11 strike-suiters from “tracing” their shares to the IPO. This could enable ’33 Act defendants to knock out the lawsuits against them.</p>

<p><strong><em>Basics of Section 11 Standing and Tracing</em></strong></p>

<p>Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S. Code § 77k, provides a private remedy for those who purchase shares issued pursuant to a registration statement that is materially false or misleading. The remedy applies to “any person acquiring such security.” Section 11(a). That is, a person may assert a claim with respect to shares issued pursuant to the particular registration statement.</p>

<p><a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2015/03/13/a-modest-strategy-for-combatting-frivolous-ipo-lawsuits/#more-68800" target="_blank">Click here to read the complete post...</a></p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Boris Feldman, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Friday, March 13, 2015 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.borisfeldman.com" target="_blank">Boris Feldman</a> is a member of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &amp; Rosati, P.C. The views expressed in this post are those of Mr. Feldman and do not reflect those of his firm or clients.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>With a minor change to the customary lock-up agreement, issuers and underwriters may be better able to fight frivolous IPO lawsuits. By allowing non-registration statement shares to enter the market, underwriters may prevent Section 11 strike-suiters from “tracing” their shares to the IPO. This could enable ’33 Act defendants to knock out the lawsuits against them.</p>
<p><strong>Basics of Section 11 Standing and Tracing</strong></p>
<p>Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S. Code § 77k, provides a private remedy for those who purchase shares issued pursuant to a registration statement that is materially false or misleading. The remedy applies to “any person acquiring such security.” Section 11(a). That is, a person may assert a claim with respect to shares issued pursuant to the particular registration statement.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/03/13/a-modest-strategy-for-combatting-frivolous-ipo-lawsuits/#more-68800" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading A Modest Strategy for Combatting Frivolous IPO Lawsuits">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/03/13/a-modest-strategy-for-combatting-frivolous-ipo-lawsuits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
