<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/10/15/sec-proposes-amendments-to-rules-for-administrative-proceedings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 11:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SEC Proposed Amendments to Rules for Administrative Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/10/15/sec-proposes-amendments-to-rules-for-administrative-proceedings/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sec-proposes-amendments-to-rules-for-administrative-proceedings</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/10/15/sec-proposes-amendments-to-rules-for-administrative-proceedings/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCAOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC rulemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. federal courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=71755?d=20151015094129EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On September 24, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced it had voted to propose amendments to rules governing its administrative proceedings. SEC Chair Mary Jo White noted that the &#8220;proposed amendments seek to modernize our rules of practice for administrative proceedings, including provisions for additional time and prescribed discovery for the parties.&#8221; [1] These [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Barry R. Goldsmith, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Thursday, October 15, 2015 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/bgoldsmith" target="_blank">Barry R. Goldsmith</a> is a partner at Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP. This post is based on a Gibson Dunn client alert by Mr. Goldsmith, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/jcohen" target="_blank">Joel Cohen</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/mfagel" target="_blank">Marc J. Fagel</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/mloseman" target="_blank">Monica K. Loseman</a>, and <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/mschonfeld" target="_blank">Mark Schonfeld</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>On September 24, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced it had voted to propose amendments to rules governing its administrative proceedings. SEC Chair Mary Jo White noted that the &#8220;proposed amendments seek to modernize our rules of practice for administrative proceedings, including provisions for additional time and prescribed discovery for the parties.&#8221; <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/10/15/sec-proposes-amendments-to-rules-for-administrative-proceedings/#1">[1]</a><a name="1b"></a> These proposals follow the SEC&#8217;s June 2014 announcement that it intended to bring more cases through administrative proceedings rather than in federal court <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/10/15/sec-proposes-amendments-to-rules-for-administrative-proceedings/#2">[2]</a><a name="2b"></a> and the release of the Division of Enforcement&#8217;s May 2015 guidance entitled &#8220;Approach to Forum Selection in Contested Actions,&#8221; explaining how the SEC chooses between administrative proceedings and federal court to litigate its claims. <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/10/15/sec-proposes-amendments-to-rules-for-administrative-proceedings/#3">[3]</a><a name="3b"></a><br />
 <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/10/15/sec-proposes-amendments-to-rules-for-administrative-proceedings/#more-71755" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading SEC Proposed Amendments to Rules for Administrative Proceedings">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/10/15/sec-proposes-amendments-to-rules-for-administrative-proceedings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
