<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/12/14/the-soviet-constitution-problem-in-comparative-corporate-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 11:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Soviet Constitution Problem in Comparative Corporate Law</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/12/14/the-soviet-constitution-problem-in-comparative-corporate-law/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-soviet-constitution-problem-in-comparative-corporate-law</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/12/14/the-soviet-constitution-problem-in-comparative-corporate-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HLS Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Takeovers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=72098?d=20230309152031EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leo E. Strine, Jr., Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court, the Austin Wakeman Scott Lecturer on Law and a Senior Fellow of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, recently issued an essay that is forthcoming in the Southern California Law Review. The essay, titled The Soviet Constitution Problem in Comparative Corporate Law: Testing the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Kobi Kastiel, Co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Monday, December 14, 2015 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">This post comes to us from Leo E. Strine, Jr., Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court, the Austin Wakeman Scott Lecturer on Law and a Senior Fellow of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance. This post is based on Chief Justice Strine’s recent essay, <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2688018" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Soviet Constitution Problem in Comparative Corporate Law: Testing the Proposition that European Corporate Law is More Stockholder Focused than U.S. Corporate Law</a>, issued as Discussion Paper of the Program on Corporate Governance and forthcoming in the <em>Southern California Law Review. </em>Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=989624" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance</a>, by Chief Justice Strine; and <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=387940" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power</a>, by Lucian Bebchuk.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Leo E. Strine, Jr., Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court, the Austin Wakeman Scott Lecturer on Law and a Senior Fellow of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, recently issued an essay that is forthcoming in the <em>Southern California Law Review</em>. The essay, titled <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2688018" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Soviet Constitution Problem in Comparative Corporate Law: Testing the Proposition that European Corporate Law is More Stockholder Focused than U.S. Corporate Law</a>, is available <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2688018" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>. The abstract of Chief Justice Strine’s essay summarizes it as follows:</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/12/14/the-soviet-constitution-problem-in-comparative-corporate-law/#more-72098" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Soviet Constitution Problem in Comparative Corporate Law">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/12/14/the-soviet-constitution-problem-in-comparative-corporate-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
