<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/01/04/global-and-regional-trends-in-corporate-governance-in-2016/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:11:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Global and Regional Trends in Corporate Governance in 2016</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/01/04/global-and-regional-trends-in-corporate-governance-in-2016/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=global-and-regional-trends-in-corporate-governance-in-2016</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/01/04/global-and-regional-trends-in-corporate-governance-in-2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 14:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=72190?d=20160104091127EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few years, institutional investors have held boards increasingly accountable for company performance and have demanded greater transparency and engagement with directors. The real question investors are asking is How can we be sure we have a high-performing board in place? Most of the governance reforms currently under discussion globally attempt to address [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Anthony Goodman, Russell Reynolds Associates, on Monday, January 4, 2016 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.russellreynolds.com/consultants/anthony-goodman" target="_blank">Anthony Goodman</a> is a member of the Board Effectiveness Practice at Russell Reynolds Associates. This post is based on an Russell Reynolds publication authored by Mr. Goodman and <a href="http://www.russellreynolds.com/consultants/jack-okelley" target="_blank">Jack &#8220;Rusty&#8221; O&#8217;Kelley, III</a>, available <a href="http://www.russellreynolds.com/insights/thought-leadership/Documents/Global%20and%20Regional%20Trends%20for%20%20Corporate%20Governance%20in%202016.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Over the past few years, institutional investors have held boards increasingly accountable for company performance and have demanded greater transparency and engagement with directors. The real question investors are asking is <strong>How can we be sure we have a high-performing board in place?</strong> Most of the governance reforms currently under discussion globally attempt to address that question.</p>
<p>Around the world, large institutional investors continue to push hard for reforms that will enable them to elect independent non-executive directors who will constructively challenge management on strategy and hold executives accountable for performance (and pay them accordingly). When trust breaks down, activist investors (often hedge funds) move in to drive for change, often with institutional support.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/01/04/global-and-regional-trends-in-corporate-governance-in-2016/#more-72190" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Global and Regional Trends in Corporate Governance in 2016">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/01/04/global-and-regional-trends-in-corporate-governance-in-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
