<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/07/05/index-eligibility-as-governance-battlefield-why-the-system-is-not-broken-and-we-can-live-with-dual-class-issuers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Index Eligibility as Governance Battlefield: Why the System is Not Broken and We Can Live With Dual Class Issuers</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/07/05/index-eligibility-as-governance-battlefield-why-the-system-is-not-broken-and-we-can-live-with-dual-class-issuers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=index-eligibility-as-governance-battlefield-why-the-system-is-not-broken-and-we-can-live-with-dual-class-issuers</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/07/05/index-eligibility-as-governance-battlefield-why-the-system-is-not-broken-and-we-can-live-with-dual-class-issuers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controlling shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dual-class stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrenchment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minority shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mutual funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private ordering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recapitalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=96531?d=20170705090209EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As passive investing via funds that track market indices continues to grow, the terrain where investors are fighting battles over governance reform is now expanding beyond contested stockholder meetings and into debates over the criteria for eligibility of issuers for inclusion in these indices. Indeed, in this era of index fund investing, a company focused [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Ethan A. Klingsberg, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Wednesday, July 5, 2017 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a class="external" href="https://www.clearygottlieb.com/professionals/ethan-a-klingsberg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">Ethan A. Klingsberg</a> is a partner in the New York office of Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton LLP. This post is based on a Cleary Gottlieb publication by Mr. Klingsberg. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2954630">Untenable Case for Perpetual Dual-Class Stock</a> by Lucian Bebchuk and Kobi Kastiel (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/04/24/the-untenable-case-for-perpetual-dual-class-stock/">here</a>).</p>
</div></hgroup><p>As passive investing via funds that track market indices continues to grow, the terrain where investors are fighting battles over governance reform is now expanding beyond contested stockholder meetings and into debates over the criteria for eligibility of issuers for inclusion in these indices. Indeed, in this era of index fund investing, a company focused on the future trading price of its shares should be much more concerned about gaining entry into and maintaining eligibility for indices than whether there will be a withhold vote recommendation on the members of its governance committee. If this direction continues to gain traction, we could end up with a market dominated by passive strategy investing where the current importance of familiarity with the hot button governance concerns of proxy advisory firms and institutional investors becomes subsidiary to understanding how to navigate new, governance-related eligibility requirements of major equity indices.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/07/05/index-eligibility-as-governance-battlefield-why-the-system-is-not-broken-and-we-can-live-with-dual-class-issuers/#more-96531" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Index Eligibility as Governance Battlefield: Why the System is Not Broken and We Can Live With Dual Class Issuers">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/07/05/index-eligibility-as-governance-battlefield-why-the-system-is-not-broken-and-we-can-live-with-dual-class-issuers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
