<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/08/09/why-financialized-corporate-governance-works-poorly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 11:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Why Financialized Corporate Governance Works Poorly</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/08/09/why-financialized-corporate-governance-works-poorly/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-financialized-corporate-governance-works-poorly</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/08/09/why-financialized-corporate-governance-works-poorly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 13:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agency costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Term value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short-termism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systemic risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=100669?d=20170816111706EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corporate finance textbooks describe shareholders as the owners of a corporation and teach future managers how to create “shareholder value.” Increasing shareholder value is generally seen synonymous with increasing “shareholder wealth” as measured by the market value of their shares. The academic literature views conflicts between managers and shareholders as the main challenge of corporate [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Anat R. Admati, Stanford University, on Wednesday, August 9, 2017 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/faculty/anat-r-admati">Anat R. Admati</a> is George G.C. Parker Professor of Finance and Economics at Stanford Graduate School of Business. This post is based on Professor Admati&#8217;s recent <a href="http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.31.3.131">article</a>, published in the <em>Journal of Economic Perspectives</em>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Corporate finance textbooks describe shareholders as the owners of a corporation and teach future managers how to create “shareholder value.” Increasing shareholder value is generally seen synonymous with increasing “shareholder wealth” as measured by the market value of their shares. The academic literature views conflicts between managers and shareholders as the main challenge of corporate governance. Common practices to align managers’ interests with those of shareholders include paying managers with stocks or options and rewarding them based on financial metrics such as (accounting) profits and return on equity.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/08/09/why-financialized-corporate-governance-works-poorly/#more-100669" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Why Financialized Corporate Governance Works Poorly">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/08/09/why-financialized-corporate-governance-works-poorly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
