<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/12/11/derivative-suits-and-unlawful-business-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 18:46:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Derivative Suits and Unlawful Business Practices</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/12/11/derivative-suits-and-unlawful-business-practices/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=derivative-suits-and-unlawful-business-practices</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/12/11/derivative-suits-and-unlawful-business-practices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance and disclosure interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivative suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Director liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duty of loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation 5.16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder suits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=103405?d=20171211085836EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Delaware court recently allowed a stockholder’s derivative complaint to proceed where the board of directors allegedly breached their duty of loyalty by knowingly allowing the company to violate a federal regulation. In upholding the complaint, the court examined the company’s prior SEC disclosures describing its business practices to conclude they violated the “plain language” [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Steven M. Haas, Hunton & Williams LLP , on Monday, December 11, 2017 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a class="external" href="https://www.hunton.com/en/people/steven-haas.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Steven M. Haas</a> is a partner at Hunton &amp; Williams LLP. This post is based on a Hunton &amp; Williams publication by Mr. Haas and is part of the <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>A Delaware court recently allowed a stockholder’s derivative complaint to proceed where the board of directors allegedly breached their duty of loyalty by knowingly allowing the company to violate a federal regulation. In upholding the complaint, the court examined the company’s prior SEC disclosures describing its business practices to conclude they violated the “plain language” of the regulation. More importantly, the court inferred that the directors knew of the noncompliance, despite the absence of any “red flags” to put the board on notice, because “the Regulation itself is so clear on its face.” The court acknowledged the unusual factual allegations in the complaint, but the ruling nevertheless illustrates one of many potential pitfalls arising from compliance failures, especially in regulated industries.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/12/11/derivative-suits-and-unlawful-business-practices/#more-103405" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Derivative Suits and Unlawful Business Practices">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/12/11/derivative-suits-and-unlawful-business-practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
