<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/01/20/governance-gone-wild-misbehavior-at-uber-technologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 11:32:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Governance Gone Wild: Misbehavior at Uber Technologies</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/01/20/governance-gone-wild-misbehavior-at-uber-technologies/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=governance-gone-wild-misbehavior-at-uber-technologies</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/01/20/governance-gone-wild-misbehavior-at-uber-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2018 15:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance & ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=104213?d=20180120103738EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently published a paper on SSRN, Governance Gone Wild: Epic Misbehavior at Uber Technologies, that evaluates governance and leadership challenges through the example of the private ride-sharing startup Uber. Despite its importance, there is surprisingly little consensus among researchers about the organizational attributes that are critical for “good” corporate governance. Research generally shows that [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by David F. Larcker and Brian Tayan (Stanford University), on Saturday, January 20, 2018 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a class="external" href="https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/faculty/david-f-larcker" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">David F. Larcker</a> is James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting and <a class="external" href="https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/contact/brian-tayan" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Brian Tayan</a> is a Researcher with the Corporate Governance Research Initiative at Stanford Graduate School of Business. This post is based on their recent <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3087371">paper</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>We recently published a paper on SSRN, <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3087371">Governance Gone Wild: Epic Misbehavior at Uber Technologies</a>, that evaluates governance and leadership challenges through the example of the private ride-sharing startup Uber.</p>
<p>Despite its importance, there is surprisingly little consensus among researchers about the organizational attributes that are critical for “good” corporate governance. Research generally shows that the structural features of a governance system—the size and structure of the board and the implementation of so-called best practices for audit, risk, compensation, and succession—do not have a reliable (positive or negative) impact on firm performance and outcomes. Some research finds that the human elements of governance—such as leadership, culture, and tone from the top—do influence outcomes, but these are difficult to measure and assess with accuracy.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/01/20/governance-gone-wild-misbehavior-at-uber-technologies/#more-104213" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Governance Gone Wild: Misbehavior at Uber Technologies">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/01/20/governance-gone-wild-misbehavior-at-uber-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
