<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/06/08/the-enforceability-of-employment-arbitration-agreements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 11:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Enforceability of Employment Arbitration Agreements</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/06/08/the-enforceability-of-employment-arbitration-agreements/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-enforceability-of-employment-arbitration-agreements</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/06/08/the-enforceability-of-employment-arbitration-agreements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 13:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=107809?d=20180608133333EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court, in a long-awaited decision, held that employment arbitration agreements with class action waivers requiring individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”), notwithstanding Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (the “NLRA”), which protects employees’ rights to engage in concerted activities. In [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Robert Atkins, Liza Velazquez and Maria Keane, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Friday, June 8, 2018 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/robert-a-atkins">Robert Atkins</a> and <a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/liza-m-velazquez">Liza Velazquez</a> are partners and <a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/maria-helen-keane">Maria Keane</a> is counsel at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &amp; Garrison LLP. This post is based on a Paul Weiss publication by Mr. Atkins, Ms. Velazquez, Ms. Keane, <a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/david-w-brown">David Brown</a>, <a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/jay-cohen">Jay Cohen</a> and <a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/daniel-j-toal">Daniel Toal</a>. <a class="footnote" id="1b" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/06/08/the-enforceability-of-employment-arbitration-agreements/#1">[1]</a></p>
</div></hgroup><p>On May 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court, in a long-awaited decision, held that employment arbitration agreements with class action waivers requiring individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”), notwithstanding Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (the “NLRA”), which protects employees’ rights to engage in concerted activities. In so ruling, the Court’s 5-4 decision, issued in <em>Epic Systems Corp. </em>v. <em>Lewis</em>, which had been consolidated with two other cases, <em>Ernst &amp; Young, LLP</em> v. <em>Morris</em> and <em>NLRB </em>v. <em>Murphy Oil USA, Inc.</em>, resolved the different approaches federal courts had taken on this issue for years. Although the majority opinion acknowledged that the efficacy of class action waivers in arbitration agreements is, “[a]s a matter of policy[,]” debatable, it ruled that “as a matter of law the answer is clear”—federal courts must enforce arbitration agreements in accordance with their terms, including those that require individualized arbitration.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/06/08/the-enforceability-of-employment-arbitration-agreements/#more-107809" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Enforceability of Employment Arbitration Agreements">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/06/08/the-enforceability-of-employment-arbitration-agreements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
