<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/09/17/corporate-law-should-embrace-putting-workers-on-boards-the-evidence-is-behind-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 11:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Corporate Law Should Embrace Putting Workers On Boards: The Evidence Is Behind Them</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/09/17/corporate-law-should-embrace-putting-workers-on-boards-the-evidence-is-behind-them/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=corporate-law-should-embrace-putting-workers-on-boards-the-evidence-is-behind-them</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/09/17/corporate-law-should-embrace-putting-workers-on-boards-the-evidence-is-behind-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mutual funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pension funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder primacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stakeholders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=111036?d=20180924094814EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the Dean of Harvard Law, Robert Clark, wrote his classic text on Corporate Law in 1986, he said that if you only wanted to grasp the basics, &#8220;you must, at the very least, also gain a working knowledge of labor law.&#8221; That neglected truth might become much more significant soon, because a growing number [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Ewan McGaughey (King's College, London), on Monday, September 17, 2018 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/persons/ewan-mcgaughey(e0b61e3a-33c1-46e2-98c5-6ac8623d84bf)/biography.html">Ewan McGaughey</a> is Senior Lecturer in Private Law at King&#8217;s College, London. This post is based on his recent <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3246974">article</a>, forthcoming in the <em>Seattle University Law Review</em>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>When the Dean of Harvard Law, Robert Clark, wrote his classic text on <em>Corporate Law </em>in 1986, he said that if you only wanted to grasp the basics, &#8220;you must, at the very least, also gain a working knowledge of labor law.&#8221; That neglected truth might become much more significant soon, because a growing number of lawmakers are proposing federal rights for employee representation on corporate boards. The <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/3348/text">Accountable Capitalism Act</a>, which is getting a lot of attention, would require 40% of boards in $1bn companies are employee-elected, and those companies would also get a federal charter. The <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/2605/text">Reward Work Act</a>, which caught less attention, would require one third employee-elected boards in all listed companies.</p>
<p>On this forum, four posts have been sceptical about the merits of ending the shareholder monopoly on corporate governance. Summarizing a forthcoming article of mine called &#8220;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3246974">Democracy in America at work: the history of labor’s vote in corporate governance</a>&#8220;, this post sets out a positive case: (1) the evidence shows worker voice is embedded in American tradition and would expand economic prosperity, (2) worker voice now represents best corporate governance practice in the majority of OECD countries, and (3) there is no credible defense for &#8220;shareholder primacy&#8221;, because asset managers are voting on &#8220;other people’s money&#8221;: those people are usually employees saving for retirement.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/09/17/corporate-law-should-embrace-putting-workers-on-boards-the-evidence-is-behind-them/#more-111036" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Corporate Law Should Embrace Putting Workers On Boards: The Evidence Is Behind Them">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/09/17/corporate-law-should-embrace-putting-workers-on-boards-the-evidence-is-behind-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
