<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/10/31/materiality-and-efforts-qualifiers-some-distinctions-some-without-differences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Materiality and Efforts Qualifiers—Some Distinctions, Some Without Differences</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/10/31/materiality-and-efforts-qualifiers-some-distinctions-some-without-differences/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=materiality-and-efforts-qualifiers-some-distinctions-some-without-differences</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/10/31/materiality-and-efforts-qualifiers-some-distinctions-some-without-differences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 12:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquisition agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merger litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & acquisitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=112056?d=20181031085741EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much deserved attention has been paid to the first finding of a &#8220;material adverse change&#8221; (MAC) by a Delaware court in the recent Akorn decision. Of perhaps equal practical importance to dealmakers is the court&#8217;s guidance on a question that has long occupied draftspersons—whether or not there is, and the extent of, any legal difference [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Daniel E. Wolf and Eric L. Schiele, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, on Wednesday, October 31, 2018 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p><a class="external" href="https://www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm?contentID=220&amp;itemID=9713" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">Daniel E. Wolf</a> and <a href="https://www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm?contentID=220&amp;itemid=12758">Eric L. Schiele</a> are partners at Kirkland &amp; Ellis LLP. This post is based on a Kirkland &amp; Ellis publication by Mr. Wolf and Mr. Schiele, and <span class="paragraph"><span class="highlight"><span class="colour"><span class="font"><span class="size">is part of the <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a></span></span></span></span></span>. <span class="paragraph">Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes<span class="highlight"><span class="colour"><span class="font"><span class="size"> </span></span></span></span><a class="external" href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=2593866" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">M&amp;A Contracts: Purposes, Types, Regulation, and Patterns of Practice</a> and <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2133343">Allocating Risk Through Contract: Evidence from M&amp;A and Policy Implications</a> (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/14/allocating-risk-through-contract-evidence-from-ma-and-policy-implications/">here</a>),<span class="highlight"><span class="colour"><span class="font"><span class="size"> both by John C. Coates, IV.<br />
</span></span></span></span></span></p>
</div></hgroup><p>Much deserved attention has been paid to the first finding of a &#8220;material adverse change&#8221; (MAC) by a Delaware court in the recent <em>Akorn</em> decision. Of perhaps equal practical importance to dealmakers is the court&#8217;s guidance on a question that has long occupied draftspersons—whether or not there is, and the extent of, any legal difference between the many shades of qualifiers used in deal agreements on two key terms: materiality modifiers and efforts covenants. Building on earlier Delaware decisions, the court reached a clear split decision on this question.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/10/31/materiality-and-efforts-qualifiers-some-distinctions-some-without-differences/#more-112056" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Materiality and Efforts Qualifiers—Some Distinctions, Some Without Differences">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/10/31/materiality-and-efforts-qualifiers-some-distinctions-some-without-differences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
