<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/16/the-perils-of-dells-low-voting-stock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 20:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Perils of Dell&#8217;s Low-Voting Stock</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/16/the-perils-of-dells-low-voting-stock/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-perils-of-dells-low-voting-stock</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/16/the-perils-of-dells-low-voting-stock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empirical Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HLS Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agency costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter & bylaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controlling shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dual-class stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrenchment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Term value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minority shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ownership structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder value]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=113145?d=20230309145931EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell Technologies Inc. (“Dell”) is planning a “backdoor-IPO” transaction that would bring it back to the public market with a multiclass structure. In a short paper we recently placed on SSRN, The Perils of Dell’s Low-Voting Stock, we identify and analyze three governance risks and costs that Dell’s IPO structure would create for public investors [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Lucian A. Bebchuk (Harvard Law School) and Kobi Kastiel (Tel Aviv University), on Friday, November 16, 2018 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/bebchuk/">Lucian Bebchuk</a> is the James Barr Ames Professor of Law, Economics, and Finance and Director of the Program on Corporate Governance, Harvard Law School. <a href="https://english.tau.ac.il/profile/kastiel">Kobi Kastiel</a> is Assistant Professor of Law at Tel Aviv University, and Senior Fellow at Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance. This post is based on their recent paper, <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3285296">The Perils of Dell’s Low-Voting Stock</a>. The paper is part of the work of the <a href="https://pcg.law.harvard.edu/project-on-controlling-shareholders/">Research Project on Controlling Shareholders</a> of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance. The Project’s related work includes <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2954630">The Untenable Case for Perpetual Dual-Class Stock</a> (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/04/24/the-untenable-case-for-perpetual-dual-class-stock/">here</a>), and <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3128375">The Perils of Small-Minority Controllers</a> (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/02/26/the-perils-of-small-minority-controllers/">here</a>), both by Lucian Bebchuk and Kobi Kastiel.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Dell Technologies Inc. (“Dell”) is planning a “backdoor-IPO” transaction that would bring it back to the public market with a multiclass structure. In a short paper we recently placed on SSRN, <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3285296">The Perils of Dell’s Low-Voting Stock</a>, we identify and analyze three governance risks and costs that Dell’s IPO structure would create for public investors holding Dell’s low-voting stock:</p>
<ul>
<li>Lifetime entrenchment of Michael Dell (“MD”): He would be able to retain control indefinitely even after he ceases to be a fitting leader and even if he becomes disabled or incompetent.</li>
<li>Small-minority controller: Although MD would initially hold a majority of the equity capital, Dell’s structure would enable him to unload most of his shares and still retain control even with a small equity stake, and his status as small-minority controller would be expected to produce substantial governance risks and costs.</li>
<li>Midstream changes: Dell’s governance structure would enable MD to adopt subsequent changes in governance arrangements, without any support from public investors, which would increase Dell&#8217;s governance risks beyond the risks associated with a small-minority controller.</li>
</ul>
<p>Each of these governance risks can be expected to both (i) decrease the expected future value of Dell by increasing agency costs and distortions, and (ii) increase the discount to a per-share value of Dell at which low-voting shares of Dell can be expected to trade. Both types of effects would operate to reduce the value at which the low-voting shares of public investors would trade and therefore should be taken into account in assessing the risks to such investors posed by Dell’s planned structure.</p>
<p>Below is a more detailed account of our analysis:</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/16/the-perils-of-dells-low-voting-stock/#more-113145" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Perils of Dell&#8217;s Low-Voting Stock">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/16/the-perils-of-dells-low-voting-stock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
