<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/05/15/challenging-offshore-ma-in-u-s-courts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 11:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Challenging Offshore M&#038;A in U.S. Courts</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/05/15/challenging-offshore-ma-in-u-s-courts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=challenging-offshore-ma-in-u-s-courts</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/05/15/challenging-offshore-ma-in-u-s-courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 13:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cayman Islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merger litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. federal courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=117967?d=20190515090315EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 12, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the district court abused its discretion by failing to consider a forum selection clause in a foreign issuer’s Depositary Agreement, notwithstanding the fact that the issuer is a Cayman Islands company and the gravamen of the lawsuit concerned an [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Jonathan K. Chang, Larry Portnoy, and Brian S. Weinstein, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.davispolk.com/professionals/jonathan-chang/">Jonathan K. Chang</a> is counsel, and <a href="https://www.davispolk.com/professionals/lawrence-portnoy/">Larry Portnoy</a> and <a href="https://www.davispolk.com/professionals/brian-weinstein">Brian S. Weinstein</a> are partners at Davis Polk &amp; Wardwell LLP. This post is based on their Davis Polk memorandum. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2133343">Allocating Risk Through Contract: Evidence from M&amp;A and Policy Implications</a> by John C. Coates, IV (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/14/allocating-risk-through-contract-evidence-from-ma-and-policy-implications/">here</a>).</p>
</div></hgroup><p>On April 12, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the district court abused its discretion by failing to consider a forum selection clause in a foreign issuer’s Depositary Agreement, notwithstanding the fact that the issuer is a Cayman Islands company and the gravamen of the lawsuit concerned an alleged breach of fiduciary duty by the issuer’s board of directors, which is an issue of Cayman law. This decision may encourage more shareholders to challenge offshore corporate transactions in U.S. courts.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>E-Commerce China Dangdang (“Dangdang” or the “company”) is a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands with its principal place of business in China. In 2010, the company went public, listing American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) on the New York Stock Exchange. The Depositary Agreement, entered into between Dangdang, the Depositary bank for the shares backing the ADSs, and Owners and Holders of ADSs included a forum selection clause providing that “[a]ny controversy, claim or cause of action arising out of or relating to the [ADSs] . . . shall be litigated in the Federal and state courts in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York and the Company hereby submits to the personal jurisdiction of the court in which such action or proceeding is brought.”</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/05/15/challenging-offshore-ma-in-u-s-courts/#more-117967" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Challenging Offshore M&#038;A in U.S. Courts">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/05/15/challenging-offshore-ma-in-u-s-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
