<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/11/22/the-roundtables-stakeholderism-rhetoric-is-empty-thankfully/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Roundtable’s Stakeholderism Rhetoric is Empty, Thankfully</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/11/22/the-roundtables-stakeholderism-rhetoric-is-empty-thankfully/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-roundtables-stakeholderism-rhetoric-is-empty-thankfully</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/11/22/the-roundtables-stakeholderism-rhetoric-is-empty-thankfully/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Social Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HLS Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Roundtable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder primacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stakeholders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=124585?d=20230309153623EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This summer, the Business Roundtable released an updated “Statement on the Purpose of the Corporation” that disavows the Roundtable’s longstanding endorsement of shareholder primacy—the notion that corporations should principally serve shareholders. The Statement changes precisely nothing. But that’s a good thing. Firms and the broader economy would suffer if CEOs could unilaterally disempower shareholders. The [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Jesse Fried (Harvard Law School), on Friday, November 22, 2019 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/index.html?id=722" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jesse Fried</a> is the Dane Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. This post was authored by Professor Fried.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>This summer, the Business Roundtable released an updated “Statement on the Purpose of the Corporation” that disavows the Roundtable’s longstanding endorsement of shareholder primacy—the notion that corporations should principally serve shareholders.</p>
<p>The Statement changes precisely nothing. But that’s a good thing. Firms and the broader economy would suffer if CEOs could unilaterally disempower shareholders.</p>
<p>The Statement was signed by 181 CEOs, including Apple’s Tim Cook and JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon, who committed “to lead their companies for the benefit of all stakeholders—customers, employees, suppliers, communities, and shareholders.” The CEOs appeared to be demoting their own shareholders, forcing them to compete with various other stakeholders for managers’ affections.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/11/22/the-roundtables-stakeholderism-rhetoric-is-empty-thankfully/#more-124585" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Roundtable’s Stakeholderism Rhetoric is Empty, Thankfully">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/11/22/the-roundtables-stakeholderism-rhetoric-is-empty-thankfully/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
