<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/01/12/delaware-appraisal-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 11:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Delaware Appraisal Decisions</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/01/12/delaware-appraisal-decisions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=delaware-appraisal-decisions</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/01/12/delaware-appraisal-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2020 14:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairness review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merger litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & acquisitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=125563?d=20200112095649EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The year 2019 was been another active period for Delaware valuation cases, not only in the Court of Chancery but also in the Supreme Court. In arm’s-length transactions, Delaware continues to rely primarily on the transaction price as a measure of appraisal value. Adjustments to eliminate the amount paid for synergies are highly dependent on [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Gilbert E. Matthews, Sutter Securities, Inc., on Sunday, January 12, 2020 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">Gilbert E. Matthews is Chairman Emeritus and Senior Managing Director at Sutter Securities, Inc. This post is based on his recent Sutter Securities memorandum. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2911880">Using the Deal Price for Determining “Fair Value” in Appraisal Proceedings</a> (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/02/21/using-the-deal-price-for-determining-fair-value-in-appraisal-proceedings/">here</a>) and <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3095164">Appraisal After <i>Dell</i></a>, both by Guhan Subramanian. This post is part of the <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The year 2019 was been another active period for Delaware valuation cases, not only in the Court of Chancery but also in the Supreme Court. In arm’s-length transactions, Delaware continues to rely primarily on the transaction price as a measure of appraisal value. Adjustments to eliminate the amount paid for synergies are highly dependent on expert testimony. DCF remains the principal valuation method in related party transactions. The Court of Chancery has been critical of experts on either side whose opinion it deems to be overreaching.</p>
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The year 2019 was been another active period for valuation cases in the Delaware courts. The Supreme Court reversed one 2018 Court of Chancery decision and affirmed another, and four valuation cases were decided by the Court of Chancery; the decisions are discussed below, focusing on the point of view of expert witnesses. The predominant theme is that Delaware is that, in arm’s-length transactions, appraisal value continues to be based primarily on the transaction price rather than on discounted cash flow.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/01/12/delaware-appraisal-decisions/#more-125563" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Delaware Appraisal Decisions">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/01/12/delaware-appraisal-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
