<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/07/07/dol-proposes-new-rules-regulating-esg-investments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>DOL Proposes New Rules Regulating ESG Investments</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/07/07/dol-proposes-new-rules-regulating-esg-investments/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dol-proposes-new-rules-regulating-esg-investments</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/07/07/dol-proposes-new-rules-regulating-esg-investments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 13:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Social Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=131110?d=20200707151741EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As ESG investing continues to accelerate, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) has proposed for public comment rules that would further burden the ability of fiduciaries of private-sector retirement plans to select investments based on ESG factors and would bar 401(k) plans from using a fund with any ESG mandate as the default investment alternative for [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Martin Lipton, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Tuesday, July 7, 2020 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a class="external" href="http://www.wlrk.com/mlipton/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Martin Lipton</a> is a founding partner of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz, specializing in mergers and acquisitions and matters affecting corporate policy and strategy. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton memorandum by Mr. Lipton, <a href="https://www.wlrk.com/attorney/dmsilk/">David M. Silk</a>, <a href="https://www.wlrk.com/attorney/dekahan/">David E. Kahan</a>, <a href="https://www.wlrk.com/attorney/svniles/">Sabastian V. Niles,</a> <a href="https://www.wlrk.com/attorney/acmccarthy/">Alicia C. McCarthy</a>, and <a class="external" href="https://www.wlrk.com/attorney/cxwlu/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Carmen X. W. Lu</a>. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3544978">The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance</a> by Lucian A. Bebchuk and Roberto Tallarita (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/03/02/the-illusory-promise-of-stakeholder-governance/">here</a>) and <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3244665">Reconciling Fiduciary Duty and Social Conscience: The Law and Economics of ESG Investing by a Trustee</a> by Robert H. Sitkoff and Max M. Schanzenbach (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/09/20/the-law-and-economics-of-environmental-social-and-governance-investing-by-a-fiduciary/">here</a>).</p>
</div></hgroup><p>As ESG investing continues to accelerate, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) has <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.dol.gov_sites_dolgov_files_ebsa_temporary-2Dpostings_financial-2Dfactors-2Din-2Dselecting-2Dplan-2Dinvestments-2Dproposed-2Drule.pdf&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=tW-ilfpr9ieM0wGTsomX9fiG4287KTRkQdqBzDCW-vs&amp;r=-V59zHZFD-ns88tONBNXSQ&amp;m=k0j-FlbMkZIXZz1g5JU5ZUCb_UbXIG_5oLYEav74cTY&amp;s=Sy0PNNcX-EeNRByRbm-wAZM_Xx4xxd_hz8SZOIqiuWc&amp;e=" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">proposed for public comment rules</a> that would further burden the ability of fiduciaries of private-sector retirement plans to select investments based on ESG factors and would bar 401(k) plans from using a fund with any ESG mandate as the default investment alternative for non-electing participants. The proposal asserts that “ESG investing raises heightened concerns under ERISA,” and, in contrast to the broader investor community’s recognition that ESG is about <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/docs/ESG_Metric_and_Reporting_Standards.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">value and performance</a>, and despite growing evidence that the investment returns of ESG funds can outperform those of non-ESG funds, the proposal reflects the DOL’s continued concern that ESG investment might “subordinate return or increase risk for the purpose of non-pecuniary objectives.” In terms of defining what would be an ESG-themed fund or mandate triggering heightened scrutiny and procedural requirements, the proposed rule casts the net widely to reach those featuring “one or more environmental, social, corporate governance, or similarly oriented assessments or judgments in their investment mandates, or that include these parameters in the fund name.” Such assessments and judgments have, of course, become common and mainstream, with investors, companies and fiduciaries of all kinds bringing their business determinations to bear.<u></u></p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/07/07/dol-proposes-new-rules-regulating-esg-investments/#more-131110" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading DOL Proposes New Rules Regulating ESG Investments">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/07/07/dol-proposes-new-rules-regulating-esg-investments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
