<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/10/22/do-share-buybacks-really-destroy-long-term-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 11:32:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Do Share Buybacks Really Destroy Long-Term Value?</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/10/22/do-share-buybacks-really-destroy-long-term-value/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=do-share-buybacks-really-destroy-long-term-value</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/10/22/do-share-buybacks-really-destroy-long-term-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Term value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repurchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short-termism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=133835?d=20201022085950EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Share buybacks are one of the most controversial corporate decisions today. US Senator Elizabeth Warren claimed that “buybacks create a sugar high for the corporations. It boosts prices in the short run, but the real way to boost the value of a corporation is to invest in the future, and they are not doing that.” [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Alex Edmans (London Business School), on Thursday, October 22, 2020 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a class="external" href="https://alexedmans.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Alex Edmans</a> is professor of finance at London Business School. This post is based on his recently published book <a class="external" href="https://www.growthepie.net/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><em>Grow the Pie</em></a>. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2248111">The Myth that Insulating Boards Serves Long-Term Value</a> by Lucian Bebchuk (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/04/22/the-myth-that-insulating-boards-serves-long-term-value/">here</a>); <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2291577">The Long-Term Effects of Hedge Fund Activism</a> by Lucian Bebchuk, Alon Brav, and Wei Jiang (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/08/19/the-long-term-effects-of-hedge-fund-activism/">here</a>); <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2895161">Short-Termism and Capital Flows</a> by Jesse Fried and Charles C. Y. Wang (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2895161">here</a>); and <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1845620">Share Repurchases, Equity Issuances, and the Optimal Design of Executive Pay</a>, by Jesse Fried (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/04/01/share-repurchases-equity-issuances-and-the-optimal-design-of-executive-pay/">here</a>).</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Share buybacks are one of the most controversial corporate decisions today. US Senator Elizabeth Warren claimed that “buybacks create a sugar high for the corporations. It boosts prices in the short run, but the real way to boost the value of a corporation is to invest in the future, and they are not doing that.”</p>
<p>That quote highlights the two main reasons why share repurchases are unpopular. First, they prevent investment—in wages, in new and better products, and in reducing carbon emissions. They seem to split the pie in favour of investors and at the expense of wider society. Second, they increase the short-term stock price, allowing a CEO to benefit by opportunistically cashing out her shares. Moreover, the CEO’s personal incentives to undertake repurchases are even broader than in Senator Warren’s quote. Buybacks increase not just the stock price but also a company’s earnings per share (EPS). That allows a CEO to hit any EPS target in her bonus contract—without boosting revenues or cutting costs, which were presumably the actions that the EPS target hoped to encourage.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/10/22/do-share-buybacks-really-destroy-long-term-value/#more-133835" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Do Share Buybacks Really Destroy Long-Term Value?">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/10/22/do-share-buybacks-really-destroy-long-term-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
