<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/06/13/second-circuit-reaffirms-that-confidentiality-agreements-can-create-a-relationship-of-trust-for-insider-trading-purposes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 11:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Second Circuit Reaffirms that Confidentiality Agreements Can Create a Relationship of Trust for Insider Trading Purposes</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/06/13/second-circuit-reaffirms-that-confidentiality-agreements-can-create-a-relationship-of-trust-for-insider-trading-purposes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=second-circuit-reaffirms-that-confidentiality-agreements-can-create-a-relationship-of-trust-for-insider-trading-purposes</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/06/13/second-circuit-reaffirms-that-confidentiality-agreements-can-create-a-relationship-of-trust-for-insider-trading-purposes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2021 15:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-disclosure agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. federal courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=138329?d=20210613113513EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question of whether and when a party can trade in securities when subject to an NDA is one that market participants frequently face. Recently, in United States Chow, 993 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2021), the Second Circuit offered important guidance on this topic when it affirmed the insider trading conviction of the managing director [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Andrew Ehrlich, Gregory Laufer, and Richard Tarlowe, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Sunday, June 13, 2021 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/andrew-j-ehrlich">Andrew Ehrlich</a>, <a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/gregory-f-laufer">Gregory Laufer</a>, and <a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/richard-c-tarlowe">Richard Tarlowe</a> are partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &amp; Garrison LLP. This post is based on a Paul, Weiss memorandum by Mr. Ehrlich, Mr. Laufer, Mr. Tarlowe, <a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/udi-grofman">Udi Grofman</a>, <a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/brad-s-karp">Brad Karp</a>, and <a href="https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/audra-j-soloway">Audra Soloway</a>. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2122137">Insider Trading Via the Corporation</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> by Jesse Fried (discussed on the Forum </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/08/24/insider-trading-via-the-corporation/">here</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;">).</span></p>
</div></hgroup><p>The question of whether and when a party can trade in securities when subject to an NDA is one that market participants frequently face. Recently, in <em>United States</em> <em>Chow</em>, 993 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2021), the Second Circuit offered important guidance on this topic when it affirmed the insider trading conviction of the managing director of an investment firm that was seeking to acquire a publicly traded company. The defendant’s firm and public company had entered into a nondisclosure agreement (“NDA”) requiring the firm to use any material nonpublic information (“MNPI”) obtained from the potential target <em>solely</em> for purposes of evaluating a potential acquisition. In violation of that restriction, the defendant disclosed MNPI to a business associate, who traded in the company’s securities and realized a $5 million profit.</p>
<p>Although <em>Chow</em> addressed several insider trading and other issues, this client alert addresses the one aspect of the decision that has particular practical implications for market participants. Specifically, the court held that an NDA merely requiring a party to keep information confidential—even if the NDA does not have an express trading prohibition—is sufficient to create a relationship of trust and confidence, a necessary element of an insider trading charge. In reaching that conclusion, the Second Circuit reaffirmed its prior holdings on this subject, but made the point even clearer. <a class="footnote" id="1b" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/06/13/second-circuit-reaffirms-that-confidentiality-agreements-can-create-a-relationship-of-trust-for-insider-trading-purposes/#1">[1]</a></p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/06/13/second-circuit-reaffirms-that-confidentiality-agreements-can-create-a-relationship-of-trust-for-insider-trading-purposes/#more-138329" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Second Circuit Reaffirms that Confidentiality Agreements Can Create a Relationship of Trust for Insider Trading Purposes">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/06/13/second-circuit-reaffirms-that-confidentiality-agreements-can-create-a-relationship-of-trust-for-insider-trading-purposes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
