<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/07/25/connecting-the-dots-breaking-the-esg-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 11:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Connecting the Dots: Breaking the ESG Code</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/07/25/connecting-the-dots-breaking-the-esg-code/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=connecting-the-dots-breaking-the-esg-code</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/07/25/connecting-the-dots-breaking-the-esg-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2021 14:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stakeholders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=139175?d=20210726092304EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Executive Summary In this post, we analyze how the language used in the capital markets is evolving as a result of trends in ESG investing. We suggest that traditional index investors can no longer be described as passive, due to their active engagement with corporates. Further, we analyze how activist engagements are beginning to hinge [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Dan Romito and Addison Holmes, Pickering Energy Partners, on Sunday, July 25, 2021 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">Dan Romito is Consulting Partner and Addison Holmes is an Associate in ESG Strategy &amp; Integration at Pickering Energy Partners. This post is based on their Pickering Energy Partners memorandum. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3544978">The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance</a> by Lucian A. Bebchuk and Roberto Tallarita (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/03/02/the-illusory-promise-of-stakeholder-governance/">here</a>); <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3004794">Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value</a> by Oliver Hart and Luigi Zingales (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/09/05/companies-should-maximize-shareholder-welfare-not-market-value/">here</a>); and <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3244665">Reconciling Fiduciary Duty and Social Conscience: The Law and Economics of ESG Investing by a Trustee</a> by Max M. Schanzenbach and Robert H. Sitkoff (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/09/20/the-law-and-economics-of-environmental-social-and-governance-investing-by-a-fiduciary/">here</a>).</p>
</div></hgroup><h2>Executive Summary</h2>
<p>In this post, we analyze how the language used in the capital markets is evolving as a result of trends in ESG investing. We suggest that traditional index investors can no longer be described as passive, due to their active engagement with corporates. Further, we analyze how activist engagements are beginning to hinge more and more on ESG themes. We then describe the dependence of ESG analysis on vast sets of unstandardized data. Finally, we contend that management teams must have a strategy around the data they disclose. We believe it is imperative for corporates to evolve alongside the changing tide emerging within the capital markets.</p>
<p><strong>We recommend the following seven action items for evolving with the markets:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Take time to <strong>understand the data already being utilized</strong> by ratings providers along with the outputs reflected in investment analysis (i.e., SSGA R-Model, Blackrock Aladdin Climate, etc.)</li>
<li>Ensure ESG disclosures are on topics <strong style="font-size: 10pt;">material to economic reality</strong> rather than those that tell an easy marketing story—PR marketing and Investor marketing is analogous to Oil and Water</li>
<li>The corporate sustainability report as it is known today is a great start, but it <strong style="font-size: 10pt;">represents only the second inning</strong> of the ballgame—evolution is required to take control of the narrative</li>
<li>Recognize that commitment to one framework is not enough &#8211; investors treat frameworks and ratings <strong style="font-size: 10pt;">as a mosaic and use proprietary methodologies</strong> to piece together and measure differentiators</li>
<li>Realize that ESG disclosures in their current form do not provide the underlying context required to <strong style="font-size: 10pt;">properly value intangibles</strong>, implying a disconnect in firm value</li>
<li>Understand that replicating peer efforts does <strong style="font-size: 10pt;"><em><u>not</u></em> provide a unique perspective</strong> and in most cases compounds the “echo chamber” concern, especially at the board level</li>
<li>Invest in a <strong style="font-size: 10pt;">comprehensive cybersecurity program</strong>, as it is critical both to financial and to ESG performance, and is probably one of the next “shoes to drop”</li>
</ol>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/07/25/connecting-the-dots-breaking-the-esg-code/#more-139175" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Connecting the Dots: Breaking the ESG Code">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/07/25/connecting-the-dots-breaking-the-esg-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
