<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/09/09/the-new-corporation-how-good-corporations-are-bad-for-democracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 11:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The New Corporation: How “Good” Corporations are Bad for Democracy</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/09/09/the-new-corporation-how-good-corporations-are-bad-for-democracy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-new-corporation-how-good-corporations-are-bad-for-democracy</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/09/09/the-new-corporation-how-good-corporations-are-bad-for-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 13:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Social Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder primacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stakeholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=140127?d=20210909154314EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On August 19, 2019, the Business Roundtable, led by JPMorgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon and composed of more than two hundred of America’s top CEOs, heralded the dawn of a new age of corporate capitalism. Henceforth, the CEOs proclaimed, the purpose of publicly traded corporations would be to serve the interests of workers, communities, and the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Joel Bakan (University of British Columbia), on Thursday, September 9, 2021 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://joelbakan.com/">Joel Bakan</a> is Professor at the University of British Columbia Peter A. Allard School of Law. This post is based on his recent book. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a class="external" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3544978" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance</a> (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/03/02/the-illusory-promise-of-stakeholder-governance/">here</a>) and <a class="external" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3899421" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Will Corporations Deliver Value to All Stakeholders?</a>, both by Lucian A. Bebchuk and Roberto Tallarita; <a class="external" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3677155" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">For Whom Corporate Leaders Bargain</a> by Lucian A. Bebchuk, Kobi Kastiel, and Roberto Tallarita (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/08/25/for-whom-corporate-leaders-bargain/">here</a>); and <a class="external" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3749654" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Restoration: The Role Stakeholder Governance Must Play in Recreating a Fair and Sustainable American Economy—A Reply to Professor Rock</a> by Leo E. Strine, Jr. (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/01/07/restoration-the-role-stakeholder-governance-must-play-in-recreating-a-fair-and-sustainable-american-economy-a-reply-to-professor-rock/">here</a>).</p>
</div></hgroup><p>On August 19, 2019, the Business Roundtable, led by JPMorgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon and composed of more than two hundred of America’s top CEOs, heralded the dawn of a new age of corporate capitalism. Henceforth, the CEOs proclaimed, the purpose of publicly traded corporations would be to serve the interests of workers, communities, and the environment, not only their shareholders. The declaration capped a two-decades-long trend of corporations claiming to have changed into caring and conscientious actors, ready to lead the way in solving society’s problems. I call it the “new” corporation movement.</p>
<p>To find out more about it, I visited the movement’s global hub, the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, founded and run by economist Klaus Schwab, who originated the idea of ‘stakeholder capitalism’. “Companies recognize that they have a special responsibility in the world, social and environmental responsibility,” Schwab told me in an interview. “Today it is, and has to be, part of corporate action and decision-making.” Everyone I met in Davos agreed. Richard Edelman, for example, told me how today’s corporations embrace social and environmental values as <em>core</em> values, “in the supply chain, in the hiring practices, throughout the corporation,” no longer just as peripheral “philanthropic exercises.” Michael Porter added “it’s quite remarkable how big a shift that’s been—the corporation has really reshaped and redefined itself.”</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/09/09/the-new-corporation-how-good-corporations-are-bad-for-democracy/#more-140127" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The New Corporation: How “Good” Corporations are Bad for Democracy">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/09/09/the-new-corporation-how-good-corporations-are-bad-for-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
