<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/09/07/the-politics-of-values-based-investing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 11:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Politics of Values-Based Investing</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/09/07/the-politics-of-values-based-investing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-politics-of-values-based-investing</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/09/07/the-politics-of-values-based-investing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 13:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mutual funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=149364?d=20220907072509EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Republicans are introducing legislation directing retirement plan sponsors to select investments solely based on monetary factors, an extension of the position adopted by the Trump Administration Department of Labor. The sponsors to the legislation defend it by arguing that retirement accounts should be off limits to politics. The debate stems from the increasing criticism [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Robert G. Eccles (University of Oxford) and Jill E. Fisch (University of Pennsylvania), on Wednesday, September 7, 2022 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a class="external" href="https://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/about-us/people/robert-g-eccles" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Robert Eccles</a> is Visiting Professor of Management Practice at Oxford University Said Business School and <a class="external" href="https://www.law.upenn.edu/faculty/jfisch" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Jill E. Fisch</a> is the Saul A. Fox Distinguished Professor of Business Law and co-Director of the Institute for Law and Economics at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School.</p>
<p>Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3544978">The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance</a> (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/03/02/the-illusory-promise-of-stakeholder-governance/">here</a>) by Lucian A. Bebchuk and Roberto Tallarita; <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4065731">Does Enlightened Shareholder Value Add Value?</a> (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/05/09/does-enlightened-shareholder-value-add-value/">here</a>) by Lucian A. Bebchuk, Kobi Kastiel, and Roberto Tallarita; <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3004794">Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value</a> (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/09/05/companies-should-maximize-shareholder-welfare-not-market-value/">here</a>) by Oliver Hart and Luigi Zingales; <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3244665">Reconciling Fiduciary Duty and Social Conscience: The Law and Economics of ESG Investing by a Trustee</a> (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/09/20/the-law-and-economics-of-environmental-social-and-governance-investing-by-a-fiduciary/">here</a>) by Max M. Schanzenbach and Robert H. Sitkoff; and <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3680815">Exit vs. Voice</a> (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/09/04/exit-vs-voice/">here</a>) by Eleonora Broccardo, Oliver Hart and Luigi Zingales.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Senate Republicans are introducing legislation directing retirement plan sponsors to select investments solely based on monetary factors, an extension of the position adopted by the Trump Administration Department of Labor. The sponsors to the legislation defend it by arguing that retirement accounts should be off limits to <a href="https://www.braun.senate.gov/sen-braun-colleagues-introduce-bill-maximize-americans-retirement-funds">politics.</a> The debate stems from the increasing criticism of pension and mutual funds that incorporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into their investment policies.</p>
<p>In challenging investment managers’ focus on ESG data, however, critics conflate two distinct issues. A body of empirical literature makes the claim that ESG data is relevant to evaluating a company from an economic perspective. We term this a “value-based ESG strategy.” For example, portfolio managers may invest in companies that they believe face strong growth prospects because they have products to help in the mitigation and adaption of climate change, or in companies that have strategies which will enable them to transform their business models in the fact of climate change. This is a value-based strategy. Of course, this assumes a particular perspective on the risks associated with climate change—one can argue that climate change is not real or that, even if it is, regulators will not impose costly changes on companies. The point, however, for such portfolio managers climate change is an economic risk, and their incorporation of climate-related data is a value-based investment strategy.</p>
<p>Investors who believe you can make money by investing in companies that are addressing this problem can invest in the <a href="https://www.blackrock.com/us/individual/products/320098/blackrock-future-climate-and-sustainable-economy-etf">BlackRock Future Climate and Sustainable Economy ETF</a> (BECO). Notably, BECO purports to be investing for value, not values, stating that it “seeks to maximize total return by investing in companies that BlackRock Fund Advisors (“BFA”) believes are furthering the transition to a lower carbon economy.” Similarly <a href="https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/esg-funds-outperform-peers-coronavirus">Morgan Stanley</a> touts its sustainable equity funds as outperforming their traditional peer funds.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/09/07/the-politics-of-values-based-investing/#more-149364" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Politics of Values-Based Investing">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/09/07/the-politics-of-values-based-investing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
