<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/08/07/transparent-election-initiative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 11:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Transparent Election Initiative</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/08/07/transparent-election-initiative/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=transparent-election-initiative</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/08/07/transparent-election-initiative/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 11:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United v. FEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=175540?d=20250807105703EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bipartisan team of former Montana officials have unveiled an oddly simple yet startlingly robust legal mechanism for undoing Citizens United that pares back the list of corporate powers granted by state corporation law. They have drafted a constitutional initiative (text here) and are steering it toward Montana’s 2026 ballot. Ever since the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Citizens [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Tom Moore, Center for American Progress, on Thursday, August 7, 2025 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.americanprogress.org/people/tom-moore/">Tom Moore</a> is a Senior Fellow for Democracy Policy at the Center for American Progress.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>A bipartisan team of former Montana officials have unveiled an oddly simple yet startlingly robust legal mechanism for undoing <em>Citizens United</em> that pares back the list of corporate powers granted by state corporation law. They have drafted a constitutional initiative (text <a href="https://transparentelection.org/montana-ballot-statement">here</a>) and are steering it toward Montana’s 2026 ballot.</p>
<p>Ever since the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in <em>Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission</em> in 2010, America has been told that only the Court or a constitutional amendment could stem corporate and dark money in politics. Not so.</p>
<p><em>Citizens United</em> (558 U.S. 310) held that lawmakers cannot regulate a corporation’s right to spend independently in elections. But regulations are just one tool in the legislative toolbox. Another extraordinarily powerful tool has gone largely unexamined until now: every state’s virtually unlimited authority to define the powers it grants its corporations.</p>
<p>Corporations have only the powers that states give them—no more. States stopped being choosy about the powers they granted to their corporations in the mid-1800s. But every single state retained the authority to be as choosy as they like. Every single state retains the authority to decide to no longer grant its corporations the power to spend in politics.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/08/07/transparent-election-initiative/#more-175540" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Transparent Election Initiative">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/08/07/transparent-election-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
