<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/09/22/2025-proxy-season-review-compensation-related-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 11:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>2025 Proxy Season Review: Compensation-Related Matters</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/09/22/2025-proxy-season-review-compensation-related-matters/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2025-proxy-season-review-compensation-related-matters</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/09/22/2025-proxy-season-review-compensation-related-matters/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 11:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say on pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=176603?d=20250922150618EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KEY TOPICS Support for management say-on-pay proposals remained high The number of failed say-on-pay votes continued to remain low across both the S&#38;P 500 and the Russell 3000 Overall shareholder support averaged 90% among the S&#38;P 500 and 91% among the Russell 3000 in H1 2025 (consistent with H1 2024) ISS recommendations meaningfully impacted shareholder [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Marc Treviño, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Monday, September 22, 2025 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.sullcrom.com/Lawyers/Marc-Trevino" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Marc Treviño</a> is a Partner at Sullivan &amp; Cromwell LLP. This post is based on a Sullivan &amp; Cromwell memorandum by Mr. Treviño, Julia Khomenko, Brittney G. Kidwell, and Rebecca M. Rabinowitz.</p>
</div></hgroup><h2>KEY TOPICS</h2>
<p><strong>Support for management say-on-pay proposals remained high</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The number of failed say-on-pay votes continued to remain low across both the S&amp;P 500 and the Russell 3000</li>
<li>Overall shareholder support averaged 90% among the S&amp;P 500 and 91% among the Russell 3000 in H1 2025 (consistent with H1 2024)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>ISS recommendations meaningfully impacted shareholder votes on say-on-pay proposals </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Compared to proposals ISS supported, proposals with negative recommendations received 26% and 22% lower support on average, respectively, at S&amp;P 500 and Russell 3000 companies • Alignment of CEO pay with relative total shareholder return remained the most important quantitative factor underlying ISS negative recommendations</li>
<li>Limited, opaque or undisclosed performance goals became the most often cited qualitative factor underlying ISS negative recommendations and use of above-target payout was the second-most cited (compared to the use of above payout target as the most often cited in H1 2024)</li>
</ul>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/09/22/2025-proxy-season-review-compensation-related-matters/#more-176603" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading 2025 Proxy Season Review: Compensation-Related Matters">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/09/22/2025-proxy-season-review-compensation-related-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
