<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/08/sec-staff-narrows-review-of-rule-14a-8-no-action-requests-every-silver-lining-has-a-touch-of-grey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 11:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SEC Staff Narrows Review of Rule 14a-8 No-Action Requests: Every Silver Lining Has a Touch of Grey</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/08/sec-staff-narrows-review-of-rule-14a-8-no-action-requests-every-silver-lining-has-a-touch-of-grey/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sec-staff-narrows-review-of-rule-14a-8-no-action-requests-every-silver-lining-has-a-touch-of-grey</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/08/sec-staff-narrows-review-of-rule-14a-8-no-action-requests-every-silver-lining-has-a-touch-of-grey/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 12:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 14a-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=178009?d=20251205231130EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On November 17, 2025, the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a significant procedural shift in its administration of the no-action request process for shareholder proposals under Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). Except as discussed below, for the proxy season that [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Brad Goldberg, Reid Hooper, and Justin Kisner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 8, 2025 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.cooley.com/people/brad-goldberg">Brad Goldberg</a> is a Partner, and <a href="https://www.cooley.com/people/reid-hooper">Reid Hooper</a> and <a href="https://www.cooley.com/people/justin-kisner">Justin Kisner</a> are Special Counsels at Cooley LLP. <span style="font-size: 10pt;">This post is based on a Cooley memorandum by Mr. Goldberg, Mr. Hooper, Mr. Kisner, <a href="https://www.cooley.com/people/sarah-sellers">Sarah Sellers</a>, <a href="https://www.cooley.com/people/michael-mencher">Michael Mencher</a>, and <a href="https://www.cooley.com/people/amanda-weiss">Amanda Weiss</a>.</span></p>
</div></hgroup><p>On November 17, 2025, the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) <a href="https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/statement-regarding-division-corporation-finances-role-exchange-act-rule-14a-8-process-current-proxy-season" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">announced</a> a significant procedural shift in its administration of the no-action request process for shareholder proposals under Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). Except as discussed below, for the proxy season that runs from October 1, 2025, through September 30, 2026, the staff will not provide a substantive response to no-action requests from companies seeking to exclude shareholder proposals from their definitive proxy materials, pursuant to Rule 14a-8, during the current proxy season. A company planning to exclude a shareholder proposal from its definitive proxy materials still must provide the “informational only” notice of its intent to exclude the proposal required by the rule. In addition, if the company includes in its notice an unqualified representation that the company has a reasonable basis to exclude the proposal based on the provisions of Rule 14a-8, prior published guidance and/ or judicial decisions, the staff will provide a written “no objection” response.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/08/sec-staff-narrows-review-of-rule-14a-8-no-action-requests-every-silver-lining-has-a-touch-of-grey/#more-178009" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading SEC Staff Narrows Review of Rule 14a-8 No-Action Requests: Every Silver Lining Has a Touch of Grey">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/08/sec-staff-narrows-review-of-rule-14a-8-no-action-requests-every-silver-lining-has-a-touch-of-grey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
