<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/16/retaining-the-c-suite-after-ceo-turnover-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 11:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Retaining the C-Suite After CEO Turnover</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/16/retaining-the-c-suite-after-ceo-turnover-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=retaining-the-c-suite-after-ceo-turnover-2</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/16/retaining-the-c-suite-after-ceo-turnover-2/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 12:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-suite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEOs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=178089?d=20251216093010EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2021, FW Cook sought to better understand how companies can effectively retain their C-suite leaders after CEO turnover. Ensuring stability across the leadership team is an important factor in executing proper CEO succession, particularly as it applies to high-value individuals that may have been considered as CEO candidates themselves. Our prior study found that [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Marco Pizzitola, Desmond Pang, and Joe Sorrentino, FW Cook, on Tuesday, December 16, 2025 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">Marco Pizzitola and Desmond Pang are Consultants, and Joe Sorrentino is a Managing Director at FW Cook. This post is based on their FW Cook report.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>In 2021, FW Cook sought to better understand how companies can effectively retain their C-suite leaders after CEO turnover. Ensuring stability across the leadership team is an important factor in executing proper CEO succession, particularly as it applies to high-value individuals that may have been considered as CEO candidates themselves. Our prior study found that special one-time equity grants made to the leadership team have a strong retention effect in the short term, but that the effect wanes quickly</p>
<p>This year, FW Cook refreshed the study with new data to test for changes in the prevalence or effectiveness of special equity grants as a retention strategy. While the original study focused on CEO turnover events between 2011 and 2015 (and an associated retention period through 2020), this year’s analysis focused on the following five-year window. Further, our updated analysis builds upon the original research by also exploring the retentive value of all outstanding equity awards (i.e., annual and special grants) held by C-suite leaders.</p>
<p>The findings in our updated study are largely aligned with those of the original analysis. Particularly, special equity grants made to non-CEO executives in the wake of CEO turnover continue to show a strong, but limited, retentive effect – typically lasting approximately two to three years. Prevalence and design of such awards remain consistent, although the dollar value of such awards has increased materially.</p>
<p>A new finding identified in this year’s study is that non-CEO executive grants are twice as common when the CEO is an external hire. Lastly, a correlation between total outstanding equity and length of retention was identified, regardless of whether special retention grants were made.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/16/retaining-the-c-suite-after-ceo-turnover-2/#more-178089" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Retaining the C-Suite After CEO Turnover">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/16/retaining-the-c-suite-after-ceo-turnover-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
