<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/19/when-a-whistleblower-complaint-becomes-a-board-level-red-flag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>When a Whistleblower Complaint Becomes a Board-Level “Red Flag”</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/19/when-a-whistleblower-complaint-becomes-a-board-level-red-flag/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=when-a-whistleblower-complaint-becomes-a-board-level-red-flag</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/19/when-a-whistleblower-complaint-becomes-a-board-level-red-flag/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 12:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Delaware Law Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=178319?d=20251218170000EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent Caremark decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery largely denied a motion to dismiss, holding that most of Regions Bank’s board purportedly ignored red flags raised in a whistleblower report concerning the bank’s unlawful overdraft practices — practices that later led to the company paying $191 million in penalties and remediation to the Consumer Financial [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Jim Ducayet and Barret V. Armbruster,Sidley Austin LLP, on Friday, December 19, 2025 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/d/ducayet-james-w?_gl=1*1oyfmw4*_ga*MTEzNjAzMTkzNi4xNzY1NDgwNjIx*_ga_DKRKB8GQZ2*czE3NjU0ODA2MjAkbzEkZzEkdDE3NjU0ODA2MjAkajYwJGwwJGgw">Jim Ducayet</a> is a Partner and <a href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/a/armbruster-barret-v?_gl=1*1oyfmw4*_ga*MTEzNjAzMTkzNi4xNzY1NDgwNjIx*_ga_DKRKB8GQZ2*czE3NjU0ODA2MjAkbzEkZzEkdDE3NjU0ODA2MjAkajYwJGwwJGgw">Barret V. Armbruster</a> is a Senior Managing Associate at <span style="font-size: 10pt;">Sidley Austin LLP. This post is based on their Sidley memorandum, and is part of the</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;">; links to other posts in the series are available </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;">.</span></p>
</div></hgroup><p>In a recent <a href="https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=385270" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Caremark decision</a>, the Delaware Court of Chancery largely denied a motion to dismiss, holding that most of Regions Bank’s board purportedly ignored red flags raised in a whistleblower report concerning the bank’s unlawful overdraft practices — practices that later led to the company paying $191 million in penalties and remediation to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The court found a former in‑house lawyer’s draft complaint sent to the board was a true red flag, and it held that merely engaging outside counsel to investigate, without timely corrective action, does not automatically defeat an inference of bad faith at the pleadings stage. The opinion underscores that both documented, prompt board‑level escalation and timely corrective action are critical as to compliance risks that are central to the business.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/19/when-a-whistleblower-complaint-becomes-a-board-level-red-flag/#more-178319" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading When a Whistleblower Complaint Becomes a Board-Level “Red Flag”">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/12/19/when-a-whistleblower-complaint-becomes-a-board-level-red-flag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
