<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/10/drafting-guidance-from-delaware-supreme-court-on-earnouts-efforts-obligations-and-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 11:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Drafting Guidance from Delaware Supreme Court on Earnouts, Efforts Obligations, and Fraud</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/10/drafting-guidance-from-delaware-supreme-court-on-earnouts-efforts-obligations-and-fraud/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=drafting-guidance-from-delaware-supreme-court-on-earnouts-efforts-obligations-and-fraud</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/10/drafting-guidance-from-delaware-supreme-court-on-earnouts-efforts-obligations-and-fraud/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Delaware Law Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Chancery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger agreements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=179143?d=20260209191758EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Johnson &#38; Johnson v. Fortis Advisors (Jan. 12, 2026), the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Court of Chancery’s decision that, based on the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, Johnson &#38; Johnson breached its efforts obligations with respect to the first earnout payment under the Merger Agreement pursuant to which, in 2019, it acquired [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried Frank, on Tuesday, February 10, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.friedfrank.com/our-people/gail-weinstein" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Gail Weinstein</a> is a Senior Counsel, <a href="https://www.friedfrank.com/our-people/philip-richter" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Philip Richter</a> is a Partner, and <a href="https://www.friedfrank.com/our-people/steven-epstein" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Steven Epstein</a> is the Managing Partner at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &amp; Jacobson LLP. This post is based on a Fried Frank memorandum by Ms. Weinstein, Mr. Richter, Mr. Epstein, and <a href="https://www.friedfrank.com/our-people/maxwell-yim">Maxwell Yim</a>, and is part of the <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>In Johnson &amp; Johnson v. Fortis Advisors (Jan. 12, 2026), the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Court of Chancery’s decision that, based on the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, Johnson &amp; Johnson breached its efforts obligations with respect to the first earnout payment under the Merger Agreement pursuant to which, in 2019, it acquired Auris Health, Inc., a medical robotics company. In a 2024 decision, the Court of Chancery had awarded Auris damages of over $1 billion ($300 million of it attributed to the breach with respect to the first earnout payment).</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/10/drafting-guidance-from-delaware-supreme-court-on-earnouts-efforts-obligations-and-fraud/#more-179143" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Drafting Guidance from Delaware Supreme Court on Earnouts, Efforts Obligations, and Fraud">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/10/drafting-guidance-from-delaware-supreme-court-on-earnouts-efforts-obligations-and-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
