<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/11/delaware-case-applying-indemnification-materiality-scrape-creates-risks-for-the-unwary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:32:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Delaware Case Applying Indemnification Materiality Scrape Creates Risks for the Unwary</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/11/delaware-case-applying-indemnification-materiality-scrape-creates-risks-for-the-unwary/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=delaware-case-applying-indemnification-materiality-scrape-creates-risks-for-the-unwary</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/11/delaware-case-applying-indemnification-materiality-scrape-creates-risks-for-the-unwary/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 12:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Delaware Law Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indemnification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=179212?d=20260211143214EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent post-trial opinion, the Delaware Superior Court, applying a representations and warranties materiality scrape under an M&#38;A purchase agreement indemnification provision, held that the seller breached its absence of changes representation that no event had occurred that had or reasonably could have an “adverse effect” (as opposed to a material adverse effect) on the acquisition [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Andrew J. Noreuil and Andrew Stanger, Mayer Brown LLP, on Wednesday, February 11, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/people/n/noreuil-andrew-j">Andrew J. Noreuil</a> is a Partner and <a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/people/s/stanger-andrew-j" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Andrew J. Stanger</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> is a Knowledge Counsel at Mayer Brown LLP. This post is based on their Mayer Brown memorandum, and is part of the </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1716383711419000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2HGyQ7gLJp4HB5UOHmiY9e">Delaware law series</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;">; links to other posts in the series are available </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1716383711419000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2HGyQ7gLJp4HB5UOHmiY9e">here</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;">.</span></p>
</div></hgroup><p>In a recent post-trial opinion, the Delaware Superior Court, applying a representations and warranties materiality scrape under an M&amp;A purchase agreement indemnification provision, held that the seller breached its absence of changes representation that no event had occurred that had or reasonably could have an “adverse effect” (as opposed to a material adverse effect) on the acquisition target. In addition, the Court considered the buyer’s claims for fraud and willful misconduct for the representations that were determined to have been breached after applying the materiality scrape. This Legal Update examines in detail the Court’s analysis of the purchase agreement and its application of the materiality scrape and discusses considerations for parties when negotiating materiality scrape provisions.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/11/delaware-case-applying-indemnification-materiality-scrape-creates-risks-for-the-unwary/#more-179212" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Delaware Case Applying Indemnification Materiality Scrape Creates Risks for the Unwary">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/11/delaware-case-applying-indemnification-materiality-scrape-creates-risks-for-the-unwary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
