<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/26/nevada-v-delaware-the-new-market-for-corporate-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Nevada v. Delaware: The New Market for Corporate Law</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/26/nevada-v-delaware-the-new-market-for-corporate-law/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nevada-v-delaware-the-new-market-for-corporate-law</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/26/nevada-v-delaware-the-new-market-for-corporate-law/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 12:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[officer exculpation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=179465?d=20260225164347EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Article provides the first comprehensive analysis of Nevada&#8217;s statutory amendments, legislative history, and case law. It shows that Nevada corporate law effectively forecloses shareholder litigation eliminating the shareholder rights and management accountability that have long characterized American corporate law. It reveals how plaintiff shareholders face an impossible bind: they must plead intentional wrongdoing to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Michal Barzuza (University of Virginia), on Thursday, February 26, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">Michal Barzuza is a Professor of Law at the University of Virginia. This post is based on her recent <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4746878">paper</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The Article provides the first comprehensive analysis of Nevada&#8217;s statutory amendments, legislative history, and case law. It shows that Nevada corporate law effectively forecloses shareholder litigation eliminating the shareholder rights and management accountability that have long characterized American corporate law. It reveals how plaintiff shareholders face an impossible bind: they must plead intentional wrongdoing to survive dismissal, yet Nevada uniquely bars access to the books and records necessary to meet this burden.</p>
<p>Nevada corporate law has become a central focus in corporate America. Nevada has emerged as Delaware&#8217;s principal competitor, second only to Delaware in attracting out-of-state incorporations while dominating reincorporations out of Delaware. Firms cite reduced litigation exposure as a key advantage of incorporating in Nevada. The competitive pressure from Nevada is evident: Delaware amended its law to reduce scrutiny of self-dealing transactions, moving closer to Nevada&#8217;s approach, and Texas has incorporated elements of Nevada&#8217;s statutory scheme.<a class="footnote" id="1b" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/26/nevada-v-delaware-the-new-market-for-corporate-law/#1">[1]</a> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/26/nevada-v-delaware-the-new-market-for-corporate-law/#more-179465" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Nevada v. Delaware: The New Market for Corporate Law">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/26/nevada-v-delaware-the-new-market-for-corporate-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
