<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/28/private-equity-for-all-the-paradoxical-push-to-democratize-private-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 11:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Private Equity for All: The Paradoxical Push to Democratize Private Markets</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/28/private-equity-for-all-the-paradoxical-push-to-democratize-private-markets/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=private-equity-for-all-the-paradoxical-push-to-democratize-private-markets</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/28/private-equity-for-all-the-paradoxical-push-to-democratize-private-markets/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 12:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=179514?d=20260227154912EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Efforts to open private equity and other private assets to retail investors—including now through 401(k) plans—are often framed as a long-overdue democratization of superior investment opportunities. Indeed, private equity has always been viewed as special, both for its market-beating returns and its success in making companies more profitable, yet it has historically been off-limits to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by William Clayton (Brigham Young University) and Elisabeth de Fontenay (Duke University School of Law), on Saturday, February 28, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://law.byu.edu/explore/resources/faculty-directory/william-w-clayton">William Clayton</a> is a Professor of Law at J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, and <a href="https://law.duke.edu/fac/defontenay/">Elisabeth de Fontenay</a> is the Karl W. Leo Professor of Law at Duke University School of Law. This post is based on their recent <a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=6157128">paper</a>, forthcoming in the<em> Duke Law Journal</em>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Efforts to open private equity and other private assets to retail investors—including now through 401(k) plans—are often framed as a long-overdue democratization of superior investment opportunities. Indeed, private equity has always been viewed as special, both for its market-beating returns and its success in making companies more profitable, yet it has historically been off-limits to retail investors.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=6157128">Private Equity for All: The Paradoxical Push to Democratize Private Markets</a>, we argue that the push to democratize private equity is subject to a glaring paradox. Far from sharing the spoils of private equity with the public, opening private markets to retail investors at scale is likely to erode or eliminate each and every one of the supposed advantages of private equity over public markets—not just for retail investors but across the market. Consequently, whether private equity’s appeal lies in superior investor returns or superior corporate governance, broad retail access is likely to ensure that neither one is achieved.</p>
<p>The debate has become urgent. New products targeting retail investors are continually being launched by private-asset managers and blessed by regulators. And in the summer of 2025, an executive order directed the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. Department of Labor to pave the way for private equity to access a particularly massive pool of retail capital: the $10 trillion 401(k) market. <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/28/private-equity-for-all-the-paradoxical-push-to-democratize-private-markets/#more-179514" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Private Equity for All: The Paradoxical Push to Democratize Private Markets">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/02/28/private-equity-for-all-the-paradoxical-push-to-democratize-private-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
