<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/14/delaware-supreme-court-upholds-constitutionality-of-sb21-provisions-providing-safe-harbors-for-controlling-stockholder-transactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 11:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of SB21 Provisions Providing Safe Harbors for Controlling Stockholder Transactions</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/14/delaware-supreme-court-upholds-constitutionality-of-sb21-provisions-providing-safe-harbors-for-controlling-stockholder-transactions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=delaware-supreme-court-upholds-constitutionality-of-sb21-provisions-providing-safe-harbors-for-controlling-stockholder-transactions</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/14/delaware-supreme-court-upholds-constitutionality-of-sb21-provisions-providing-safe-harbors-for-controlling-stockholder-transactions/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controlling shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe harbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 21]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=179712?d=20260313153513EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Executive Summary What’s new: The Delaware Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of amendments to the DGCL under SB21, which provide procedural safe harbors for transactions involving controlling stockholders. Why it matters: The decision shields directors, officers and controlling stockholders from equitable relief and damages if safe harbor provisions are met. What to do next: Companies should ensure [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Arthur R. Bookout, Edward B. Micheletti and Joseph O. Larkin, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Saturday, March 14, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/b/bookout-arthur-r">Arthur R. Bookout</a>, <a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/m/micheletti-edward-b">Edward B. Micheletti</a>, and <a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/l/larkin-joseph-o">Joseph O. Larkin</a> are Partners at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom LLP. This post is based on a Skadden memorandum by Mr. Bookout, Mr. Micheletti, Mr. Larkin, <a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/g/gardner-cliff-c">Cliff C. Gardner</a>, <a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/p/parker-jenness-e">Jenness E. Parker</a>, and <a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/a/ahmad-faiz">Faiz Ahmad</a>, and is part of the <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><h3>Executive Summary</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>What’s new</strong>: The Delaware Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of amendments to the DGCL under SB21, which provide procedural safe harbors for transactions involving controlling stockholders.</li>
<li><strong>Why it matters</strong>: The decision shields directors, officers and controlling stockholders from equitable relief and damages if safe harbor provisions are met.</li>
<li><strong>What to do next</strong>: Companies should ensure that transactions with controlling stockholders are approved by an informed committee of disinterested directors and/or disinterested minority stockholders to benefit from the safe harbor protections.</li>
</ul>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/14/delaware-supreme-court-upholds-constitutionality-of-sb21-provisions-providing-safe-harbors-for-controlling-stockholder-transactions/#more-179712" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of SB21 Provisions Providing Safe Harbors for Controlling Stockholder Transactions">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/14/delaware-supreme-court-upholds-constitutionality-of-sb21-provisions-providing-safe-harbors-for-controlling-stockholder-transactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
