<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/22/tracking-shareholder-proposals-and-company-exclusions-pre-season-observations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 11:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Tracking Shareholder Proposals and Company Exclusions: Pre-Season Observations</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/22/tracking-shareholder-proposals-and-company-exclusions-pre-season-observations/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tracking-shareholder-proposals-and-company-exclusions-pre-season-observations</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/22/tracking-shareholder-proposals-and-company-exclusions-pre-season-observations/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 11:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=179845?d=20260320161843EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Key Takeaways In November 2025, the SEC&#8217;s Division of Corporation Finance announced it would no longer provide responses to most no-action requests to exclude shareholder proposals. Based on early incoming data, the number of shareholder proposals going to a vote in January and February 2026 is down from last year, while the number of exclusion [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Courteney Keatinge, and Dimitri Zagoroff, Glass Lewis, on Sunday, March 22, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">Courteney Keatinge is the Vice President of ESG Research and Dimitri Zagoroff is a Senior Editor at Glass Lewis. This post is based on their Glass Lewis memorandum.</p>
</div></hgroup><div>
<h2>Key Takeaways</h2>
<div>
<ul role="list">
<li>In November 2025, the SEC&#8217;s Division of Corporation Finance announced it would no longer provide responses to most no-action requests to exclude shareholder proposals.</li>
</ul>
<ul role="list">
<li>Based on early incoming data, the number of shareholder proposals going to a vote in January and February 2026 is down from last year, while the number of exclusion notices filed is roughly the same.</li>
</ul>
<ul role="list">
<li>The absence of SEC no-action relief may have encouraged some companies to be more cautious about what proposals they exclude, and their basis for exclusion.</li>
</ul>
<ul role="list">
<li>Investors are pushing back on proposal exclusion via litigation – and getting results.</li>
<li>Compared to 2025, more of the shareholder proposals that have gone to a vote cover environmental and social topics.</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/22/tracking-shareholder-proposals-and-company-exclusions-pre-season-observations/#more-179845" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Tracking Shareholder Proposals and Company Exclusions: Pre-Season Observations">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/22/tracking-shareholder-proposals-and-company-exclusions-pre-season-observations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
