<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/27/oversight-failures-on-workplace-misconduct-can-support-fiduciary-duty-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 11:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Oversight Failures on Workplace Misconduct Can Support Fiduciary Duty Claims</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/27/oversight-failures-on-workplace-misconduct-can-support-fiduciary-duty-claims/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=oversight-failures-on-workplace-misconduct-can-support-fiduciary-duty-claims</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/27/oversight-failures-on-workplace-misconduct-can-support-fiduciary-duty-claims/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 11:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=179906?d=20260327091959EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overview In a precedent-setting derivative decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that a board of directors’ and senior officers’ failure to respond in good faith to clear red flags of workplace sexual misconduct may give rise to viable breach of fiduciary duty claims under Delaware law. In an opinion penned by Chancellor Kathleen J. McCormick, the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Kerry E. Berchem and Robert G. Lian, Jr., on Friday, March 27, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.akingump.com/en/lawyers-advisors/kerry-e-berchem">Kerry E. Berchem</a> and <a href="https://www.akingump.com/en/lawyers-advisors/robert-g-lian">Robert G. Lian, Jr.</a> are Partners at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP. This post is based on their Akin Gump memorandum and is part of the <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><h2>Overview</h2>
<p>In a precedent-setting derivative decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that a board of directors’ and senior officers’ failure to respond in good faith to clear red flags of workplace sexual misconduct may give rise to viable breach of fiduciary duty claims under Delaware law. In <a href="https://cases.justia.com/delaware/court-of-chancery/2026-c-a-no-2024-0998-ksjm.pdf?ts=1768595635">an opinion</a> penned by Chancellor Kathleen J. McCormick, the court denied motions to dismiss claims against certain directors and officers of eXp World Holdings Inc., ruling that the plaintiffs had pled sufficient facts to support allegations that the company’s fiduciaries had breached their oversight obligations and that the chief executive officer (CEO) had breached his duty of loyalty by concealing information and retaining employees implicated in the alleged misconduct. Los Angeles City Employees’ Retirement System v. Glenn Sanford, et al., C.A. No. 2024-0998-KSM (Del. Ch. Jan. 16, 2026).</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/27/oversight-failures-on-workplace-misconduct-can-support-fiduciary-duty-claims/#more-179906" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Oversight Failures on Workplace Misconduct Can Support Fiduciary Duty Claims">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/27/oversight-failures-on-workplace-misconduct-can-support-fiduciary-duty-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
