<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/04/15/how-germanys-regulatory-reset-changes-investor-engagement-and-what-it-means-for-the-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:05:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>How Germany&#8217;s Regulatory Reset Changes Investor Engagement and What It Means for The Market</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/04/15/how-germanys-regulatory-reset-changes-investor-engagement-and-what-it-means-for-the-market/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-germanys-regulatory-reset-changes-investor-engagement-and-what-it-means-for-the-market</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/04/15/how-germanys-regulatory-reset-changes-investor-engagement-and-what-it-means-for-the-market/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stewardship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=180315?d=20260427092001EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have spent any time dealing with collaborative engagement campaigns across borders, you will know the feeling: a room full of like-minded investors, a shared concern about a company’s governance or climate trajectory, and then a question brings tension to the room — “Could we be seen as acting in concert?” For stewardship professionals [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Christine Chow, Andreas Posavac, and Alexander Juschus, Embera Partners, on Wednesday, April 15, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">Christine Chow is an Advisory Council Member and Senior Consultant, AI, Governance and Stewardship; Andreas Posavac is a Managing Partner and Founding Member; and Alexander Juschus is a Senior Executive, Corporate Governance, at Embera Partners. This post is based on an Embera Partners report by Ms. Chow, Mr. Posavac, Mr. Juschus, and Catherine Marchewitz.</p>
</div></hgroup><p><span lang="EN-GB">If you have spent any time dealing with collaborative engagement campaigns across borders, you will know the feeling: a room full of like-minded investors, a shared concern about a company’s governance or climate trajectory, and then a question brings tension to the room — <em>“Could we be seen as acting in concert?”</em></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-GB">For stewardship professionals and portfolio managers, that question has long been the invisible constraint on one of the most effective tools in engagement. The logic of collaboration is sound: individual engagement with a large corporation often has limited impact for minority shareholders. Collaboration amplifies voice, shares costs, and produces more constructive dialogue with boards. For corporate issuers, facing a collective is even more daunting than dealing with individual investors — it increases pressure, attention, and often media scrutiny.</span></p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/04/15/how-germanys-regulatory-reset-changes-investor-engagement-and-what-it-means-for-the-market/#more-180315" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading How Germany&#8217;s Regulatory Reset Changes Investor Engagement and What It Means for The Market">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/04/15/how-germanys-regulatory-reset-changes-investor-engagement-and-what-it-means-for-the-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
