<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/04/27/sustainability-scarce-signals-from-significant-resolutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:20:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Sustainability: Scarce Signals From Significant Resolutions</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/04/27/sustainability-scarce-signals-from-significant-resolutions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sustainability-scarce-signals-from-significant-resolutions</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/04/27/sustainability-scarce-signals-from-significant-resolutions/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 11:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset Managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=180529?d=20260424143921EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Key Observations In 2025, there was a steep drop in the number of shareholder resolutions on sustainability that got significant shareholder support (our definition being at least 30% of independent shareholders). There were only 30 such resolutions in the US in the 2025 proxy year, compared with over 100 in each of the previous five [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Lindsey Stewart, Morningstar, Inc., on Monday, April 27, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.morningstar.com/people/lindsey-stewart" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Lindsey Stewart</a> is the Director of Investment Stewardship Research at Morningstar, Inc. This post is based on his Morningstar report.</p>
</div></hgroup><h2>Key Observations</h2>
<ul>
<li>In 2025, there was a steep drop in the number of shareholder resolutions on sustainability that got significant shareholder support (our definition being at least 30% of independent shareholders).</li>
<li>There were only 30 such resolutions in the US in the 2025 proxy year, compared with over 100 in each of the previous five years.</li>
<li>These significant resolutions are a useful guide to the sustainability topics institutional investors view as material, so their shrinking number creates an information gap.</li>
<li>Despite this, our research is still able to surface some useful trends for investors evaluating asset manager intentionality on environmental, social, and governance topics.</li>
<li>Overall, average support for significant resolutions on sustainability remained steady at around 40% for the past three proxy years, down from 54% in 2021.</li>
<li>The overall stability in average support for significant resolutions masks continued divergence in voting preferences of US and European asset managers, which has persisted since the 2021 peak.</li>
<li>Average support by 20 US asset managers for significant resolutions fell by 11 percentage points to 31% over the past three proxy years. Among 18 European firms, there was only a 3-percentage-point drop to 91% over the same period. US sustainable funds showed a similar stable trend.</li>
<li>We see a relationship between firm size and the timing of reductions in support for these proposals. The largest reductions in support by the top 10 US firms by size occurred in the 2024 proxy year. For the next 10 US firms in this study, this happened in 2025.</li>
</ul>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/04/27/sustainability-scarce-signals-from-significant-resolutions/#more-180529" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Sustainability: Scarce Signals From Significant Resolutions">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/04/27/sustainability-scarce-signals-from-significant-resolutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
