<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/05/27/the-impact-of-sec-punting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:32:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Impact of SEC Punting</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/05/27/the-impact-of-sec-punting/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-impact-of-sec-punting</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/05/27/the-impact-of-sec-punting/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 11:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No-action letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=181440?d=20260527115701EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For decades, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) acted as the de facto arbiter of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the federal securities rule governing shareholder proposals. The rule gives shareholders a procedure for proposing ballot items for corporate elections and outlines specific procedural and substantive grounds on which management can [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Anna Toniolo (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, May 27, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">Anna Toniolo is a Fellow at the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance and an S.J.D. candidate at Harvard Law School. This post is based on her recent <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6832665">paper</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>For decades, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) acted as the de facto arbiter of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the federal securities rule governing shareholder proposals. The rule gives shareholders a procedure for proposing ballot items for corporate elections and outlines specific procedural and substantive grounds on which management can lawfully exclude a proposal. The SEC used to referee this process by allowing companies to apply for “no-action” letters that effectively blessed their decisions to exclude proposals from their ballots. But in November 2025, the Commission <a href="https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/statement-regarding-division-corporation-finances-role-exchange-act-rule-14a-8-process-current-proxy-season">announced</a> that it would no longer issue such letters, leaving companies to interpret the rules for themselves.</p>
<p>My new paper, <em>The Impact of SEC Punting</em>, compares proposal activity at S&amp;P 1500 companies during the 2025 and 2026 proxy seasons to analyze how companies and shareholders have responded to the SEC’s decision to stop refereeing shareholder proposal disputes.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/05/27/the-impact-of-sec-punting/#more-181440" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Impact of SEC Punting">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/05/27/the-impact-of-sec-punting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
