<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/06/28/delaware-court-of-chancery-interprets-new-section-144-and-applies-heightened-presumption-of-director-independence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 11:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Delaware Court of Chancery Interprets New Section 144 and Applies Heightened Presumption of Director Independence</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/06/28/delaware-court-of-chancery-interprets-new-section-144-and-applies-heightened-presumption-of-director-independence/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=delaware-court-of-chancery-interprets-new-section-144-and-applies-heightened-presumption-of-director-independence</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/06/28/delaware-court-of-chancery-interprets-new-section-144-and-applies-heightened-presumption-of-director-independence/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 11:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Delaware Law Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflicted Transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Court of Chancery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demand futility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derivative litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Director Independence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=182142?d=20260626164458EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 15, 2026, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an Opinion interpreting Section 144 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the DGCL), the landmark statutory measure adopted last year to provide safe harbors for certain conflicted transactions and address director independence, among other reforms. The Opinion arose in a common context in Delaware stockholder [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Amy Simmerman, Brad Sorrels, and Jordan Cramer, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Sunday, June 28, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.wsgr.com/en/people/amy-l-simmerman.html">Amy Simmerman</a> and <a href="https://www.wsgr.com/en/people/brad-sorrels.html">Brad Sorrels</a> are Partners and <a href="https://www.wsgr.com/en/people/jordan-l-cramer.html">Jordan Cramer</a> is an Associate at at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &amp; Rosati. This post is based on a Wilson Sonsini memorandum by Ms. Simmerman, Mr. Sorrels, Ms. Cramer, <a href="https://www.wsgr.com/en/people/daniyal-m-iqbal.html">Daniyal Iqbal</a>, and <a href="https://www.wsgr.com/en/people/shannon-e-german.html">Shannon German</a>, and is part of the <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>On June 15, 2026, the Delaware Court of Chancery <a href="https://courts.delaware.gov/opinions/download.aspx?id=396770">issued an Opinion</a> interpreting Section 144 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the DGCL), the landmark statutory measure adopted last year to provide safe harbors for certain conflicted transactions and address director independence, among other reforms.<a class="footnote" id="1b" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/06/28/delaware-court-of-chancery-interprets-new-section-144-and-applies-heightened-presumption-of-director-independence/#1">[1]</a> The Opinion arose in a common context in Delaware stockholder litigation: claims over director and management compensation. In the decision, Vice Chancellor Lori W. Will applied, for the first time, the statute’s heightened presumption of independence for directors of public companies determined by the board to be independent under the relevant NYSE or Nasdaq listing standards to dismiss derivative claims on demand futility grounds.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/06/28/delaware-court-of-chancery-interprets-new-section-144-and-applies-heightened-presumption-of-director-independence/#more-182142" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Delaware Court of Chancery Interprets New Section 144 and Applies Heightened Presumption of Director Independence">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/06/28/delaware-court-of-chancery-interprets-new-section-144-and-applies-heightened-presumption-of-director-independence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
