<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/06/29/delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-stockholder-claims-as-derivative-unripe-and-untimely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 11:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Stockholder Claims as Derivative, Unripe, and Untimely</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/06/29/delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-stockholder-claims-as-derivative-unripe-and-untimely/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-stockholder-claims-as-derivative-unripe-and-untimely</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/06/29/delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-stockholder-claims-as-derivative-unripe-and-untimely/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Court of Chancery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derivative litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct vs. Derivative Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statute of limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockholder Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=182158?d=20260629120151EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 13, 2026, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed all 12 claims asserted in The Gregory M. Raiff 2000 Trust v. Jenzabar, Inc., 2026 WL 992587 (Del. Ch. Apr. 13, 2026). Some claims were exclusively derivative, some were unripe, some were time-barred, and some were deficient for a combination of these reasons. The court [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Robin Wechkin and Madison Ferraro, Sidley Austin LLP, on Monday, June 29, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/w/wechkin-robin-e">Robin Wechkin</a> is a Counsel and <a href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/f/ferraro-madison-j">Madison Ferraro</a> is a Managing Associate at Sidley Austin LLP. This post is based on their Sidley memorandum and is part of the <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>On April 13, 2026, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed all 12 claims asserted in <em>The Gregory M. Raiff 2000 Trust v. Jenzabar, Inc., 2026</em> WL 992587 (Del. Ch. Apr. 13, 2026). Some claims were exclusively derivative, some were unripe, some were time-barred, and some were deficient for a combination of these reasons. The court cited <em>Brookfield</em>’s holding that dilution claims without more are derivative and rejected the plaintiffs’ contention that their claims fell within two exceptions to <em>Brookfield</em>. The opinion also reinforces the well-established distinction between indemnification and advancement of fees and illustrates the perils for plaintiffs who file too early or too late.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/06/29/delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-stockholder-claims-as-derivative-unripe-and-untimely/#more-182158" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Stockholder Claims as Derivative, Unripe, and Untimely">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/06/29/delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-stockholder-claims-as-derivative-unripe-and-untimely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
