<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/06/the-say-on-pay-vote-is-in-what-did-it-actually-say/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 16:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Say-on-Pay Vote Is In. What Did It Actually Say?</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/06/the-say-on-pay-vote-is-in-what-did-it-actually-say/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-say-on-pay-vote-is-in-what-did-it-actually-say</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/06/the-say-on-pay-vote-is-in-what-did-it-actually-say/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 11:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2026 proxy season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annual meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation committees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say on pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=182267?d=20260702155315EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By late June, the Say-on-Pay (“SOP”) vote has usually moved from the proxy calendar into the Compensation Committee’s rearview mirror. The proxy advisor reports have been circulated, and investor relations or the corporate secretary may already know which large shareholders were supportive and which were not. This is when the approval percentage can start to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Serdar Sikca and Kenneth Sparling, FW Cook, on Monday, July 6, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://fwcook.com/serdar-sikca/">Serdar Sikca</a> is a Principal and <a href="https://fwcook.com/kenneth-h-sparling/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Kenneth Sparling</a> is a Managing Director at FW Cook. This post is based on their FW Cook memorandum.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>By late June, the Say-on-Pay (“SOP”) vote has usually moved from the proxy calendar into the Compensation Committee’s rearview mirror. The proxy advisor reports have been circulated, and investor relations or the corporate secretary may already know which large shareholders were supportive and which were not.</p>
<p>This is when the approval percentage can start to crowd out the underlying signals.</p>
<p>As of June 1, average SOP support across S&amp;P 500 companies was 91%, with only three companies falling below 50%. Most companies will be interpreting results that look broadly supportive at first glance.</p>
<p>The SOP vote records <strong>how</strong> shareholders reacted to the pay decisions and rationale presented in the proxy, yet it does not explain <strong>why</strong>. The work after the vote is to determine whether the result reveals anything the Committee should understand before fall engagement begins and compensation design decisions are finalized.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/06/the-say-on-pay-vote-is-in-what-did-it-actually-say/#more-182267" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Say-on-Pay Vote Is In. What Did It Actually Say?">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/06/the-say-on-pay-vote-is-in-what-did-it-actually-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
