<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/23/the-2026-shareholder-proposal-exclusion-experience-and-takeaways-for-the-2027-season/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The 2026 Shareholder Proposal Exclusion Experience and Takeaways for the 2027 Season</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/23/the-2026-shareholder-proposal-exclusion-experience-and-takeaways-for-the-2027-season/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-2026-shareholder-proposal-exclusion-experience-and-takeaways-for-the-2027-season</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/23/the-2026-shareholder-proposal-exclusion-experience-and-takeaways-for-the-2027-season/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no action requests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposal Exclusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proxy statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 14a-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=182616?d=20260722161353EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Executive Summary What’s new: Under the SEC Staff’s hands-off approach to company exclusions of shareholder proposals, companies excluding shareholder proposals in 2026 experienced litigation, the threat of proposal submissions under advance notice bylaws and the risk of lower voting support for directors. Why it matters: The SEC Staff’s hands-off approach is expected to continue for [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Marc S. Gerber and Jeongu Gim, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, July 23, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/g/gerber-marc-s">Marc S. Gerber</a> is a Partner and <a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/g/gim-jeongu">Jeongu Gim</a> is an Associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom LLP. This post is based on their Skadden memorandum.</p>
</div></hgroup><h2>Executive Summary</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>What’s new:</strong> Under the SEC Staff’s hands-off approach to company exclusions of shareholder proposals, companies excluding shareholder proposals in 2026 experienced litigation, the threat of proposal submissions under advance notice bylaws and the risk of lower voting support for directors.</li>
<li><strong>Why it matters:</strong> The SEC Staff’s hands-off approach is expected to continue for the 2027 proxy season. Company experiences from this proxy season will inform the approach companies take for the upcoming proxy season.</li>
<li><strong>What to do next:</strong> Companies will want to review the bases for exclusion, assess the risks in light of 2026 experiences and, where exclusion is chosen, clearly explain the bases for exclusion to minimize the risks of adverse reactions.</li>
</ul>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/23/the-2026-shareholder-proposal-exclusion-experience-and-takeaways-for-the-2027-season/#more-182616" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The 2026 Shareholder Proposal Exclusion Experience and Takeaways for the 2027 Season">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/23/the-2026-shareholder-proposal-exclusion-experience-and-takeaways-for-the-2027-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
