<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/26/new-day-new-rules-five-key-aspects-of-amended-dgcl-section-144-and-section-220/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 11:32:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>New Day, New Rules: Five Key Aspects of Amended DGCL Section 144 and Section 220</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/26/new-day-new-rules-five-key-aspects-of-amended-dgcl-section-144-and-section-220/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-day-new-rules-five-key-aspects-of-amended-dgcl-section-144-and-section-220</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/26/new-day-new-rules-five-key-aspects-of-amended-dgcl-section-144-and-section-220/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Delaware Law Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books and records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflicted Transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware General Corporation Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 220]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=182715?d=20260724162318EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In spring 2025, there was significant debate over Delaware’s Senate Bill 21 (SB21), which offered new Delaware amendments addressing controller and board conflicts, as well as access to books and records. These amendments, codified in amended Section 144 and Section 220, were enacted to provide greater predictability but also to limit excessive litigation. Amended Section [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Edward Micheletti, Jenness Parker, and Lauren Rosenello, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, July 26, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/m/micheletti-edward-b">Edward Micheletti</a> and <a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/p/parker-jenness-e">Jenness Parker</a> are Partners and <a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/r/rosenello-lauren-n">Lauren Rosenello</a> is a Counsel at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom LLP. This post is based on their Skadden memorandum and is part of the <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/category/delaware-law-series/">Delaware Law series</a>; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/category/delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>In spring 2025, there was significant debate over Delaware’s Senate Bill 21 (SB21), which offered new Delaware amendments addressing controller and board conflicts, as well as access to books and records. These amendments, codified in amended Section 144 and Section 220, were enacted to provide greater predictability but also to limit excessive litigation.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Amended Section 144</strong> established statutory safe harbors for conflicted transactions involving the board or controlling stockholders.</li>
<li><strong>Amended Section 220 </strong>was designed to curtail broad stockholder inspection rights.</li>
</ul>
<p>In general, these provisions were heralded by the corporate bar as a stabilizing measure for corporate practitioners, offering greater clarity and certainty for books and records demands and transactions involving conflicts, and helping to avoid incessant and unnecessary litigation costs in every transaction.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/26/new-day-new-rules-five-key-aspects-of-amended-dgcl-section-144-and-section-220/#more-182715" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading New Day, New Rules: Five Key Aspects of Amended DGCL Section 144 and Section 220">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/26/new-day-new-rules-five-key-aspects-of-amended-dgcl-section-144-and-section-220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
